Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,480

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Spiritual Well-Being: Conceptualization and Measurement

Ellison, Craig W.·1983·Journal of Psychology and Theology

Abstract

Recent attempts to measure the quality of life or subjective well-being show promise for a more helpful and accurate appraisal of the collective and individual state of people than objective, economically-oriented indicators have allowed. Unfortunately, the quality of life movement has virtually ignored the religious dimension of life and the part that such beliefs and practices play in well-being. In response to this void, Paloutzian and Ellison (1982) have developed a Spiritual Well-Being Scale which measures both religious and existential well-being. This article reports on the conceptualization of the spiritual well-being dimension, development of the scale, research which has utilized the scale, and suggests directions for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/009164718301100406

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1037/h0021212 · doi:10.1037/h0021212 · Paper page
  2. Allport G., 1960, A study of values
  3. Blaikie N. W. H., 1979, Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives.
  4. Bradburn N. M., 1969, The structure of psychological well-being.
  5. Campbell A., 1976, The quality of American life.
  6. Campbell A., 1981, The sense of well-being in America: Recent patterns and trends.
  7. Crumbaugh J. C., 1969, The purpose of life test.
  8. Ellison C. W., 1983, Saying goodbye to loneliness and finding intimacy.
  9. Ellison C. W., 1982, Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 1, 21
  10. Fabry J. B., 1980, The pursuit of meaning.
  11. Fowler J. W., 1981, Stages of faith.
  12. Frankl V., 1963, Man's search for meaning.
  13. Gurin G., 1960, Americans view their mental health.
  14. Lynch J. J., 1977, The broken heart: The medical consequences of loneliness.
  15. McNamara P. H., 1979, Spiritual well-being: Sociological perspectives.
  16. Moberg D. O., 1979, Spiritual well-being: Background and issues.
  17. Moberg D. O., 1974, Late life: Communities and environment policy.
  18. 10.2307/3710493 · DOI
  19. Moberg D. O., 1979, Spiritual well-being.
  20. 10.1007/BF00352936 · DOI
  21. National Interfaith Coalition on Aging, 1975, Spiritual well-being: A definition.
  22. Paloutzian R. F., 1982, Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy.
  23. Robinson J. P., 1969, Measures of social psychological attitudes.
  24. Rokeach M., 1973, The nature of human values.

Cited by

See all 1,480

Metadata

Authors
Ellison, C. W.
Venue
Journal of Psychology and Theology
Published
1983-12
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
330-338
ISSN
  • 0091-6471 (ISSN-L)
  • 2328-1162
OpenAlex
W2464153053
Cited by
1,480
References
1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spiritual Well-Being: Conceptualization and Measurement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/009164718301100406
The paper
Ellison, C. W. (1983). Spiritual Well-Being: Conceptualization and Measurement. Journal of Psychology and Theology. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164718301100406

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.