Cited by 712Customer Service Quality and LoyaltyConsumer Market Behavior and PricingService and Product Innovation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should We Delight the Customer?

Rust, R. T., Oliver, R. L.·2000·Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0092070300281008

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 712

Metadata

Authors
Rust, R. T., & Oliver, R. L.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science
Published
2000-01-01
Volume
28
Issue
1
Pages
86-94
ISSN
0092-0703 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139746788
Cited by
712
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 29
FWCI
32.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science (publishedVersion)
Funders
Washington University in St. Louis
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Service and Product Innovation
Keywords
customer delight, customer satisfaction, customer expectations, repurchase intention, customer churn, customer loyalty, competition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review