The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual and Contextual Correlates of Trust in Media Across 44 Countries
Abstract
Media research demonstrates that audience trust in the news media is a highly consequential factor, shaping audience selection of and response to media, and potentially impacting citizens’ perceptions of the political system at large. Still, our knowledge about the correlates of trust in media is limited. Only a few studies have utilized a correlational design to explore the associations between trust in media and other factors, and almost all of these studies originate in the U.S. context. The current investigation utilizes data from 44 diverse countries ( n = 57,847), collected as part of the World Values Survey, to broaden our understanding of trust in media. The aim is two-fold—to learn about individual-level correlates across contexts and to demonstrate that macro-level factors play a part in shaping such trust. Our findings indicate that levels of political interest, interpersonal trust, and exposure to television news and newspapers are positively correlated with trust in media, while education and exposure to news on the Internet are negatively associated. On the macro level, postmaterialism emerged as a consistent predictor of trust in media. State ownership of the media industry did not have a main effect on trust in media after controlling for other factors. However, an interaction was found between state ownership and level of democracy: state ownership of television is positively associated with media trust in democratic societies and negatively associated with trust in media in nondemocratic societies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic, and Political Change in 43 Societies
Inglehart, R. (1997) · doi:10.1515/9780691214429 · Cited by 5,392
The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/266350 · Cited by 3,543
Hox, J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2010) · doi:10.4324/9780203852279 · Cited by 3,469
Echo Chamber: Rush Limbaugh and the Conservative Media Establishment
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.47-0104 · Cited by 1,256
Trust, Democracy and Governance: Can Government Policies Influence Generalized Trust?
Uslaner, E. M. (2003) · Generating Social Capital · doi:10.1057/9781403979544_9 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Garrett, R. K., Gvirsman, S. D., Johnson, B. K., Tsfati, Y., Neo, R., & Dal, A. (2014) · Human Communication Research · doi:10.1111/hcre.12028 · Cited by 351
Self-citationKarlsen, R., & Aalberg, T. (2023) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2021.1945938 · Cited by 119
Who to Trust on Social Media: How Opinion Leaders and Seekers Avoid Disinformation and Echo Chambers
Dubois, E., Minaeian, S., Paquet-Labelle, A., & Beaudry, S. (2020) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/2056305120913993 · Cited by 105
Lu, J., & Luo, C. (2020) · Information Development · doi:10.1177/0266666919848815 · Cited by 6
Thawnghmung, A. M., Whitten-Woodring, J., Lynn, T. T., & Abou-Khalil, C. (2026) · International Journal of Communication · doi:10.65476/8csffs51
“Tsfati and Ariely (2014) found that while there is a lack of trust in the state-controlled media in autocratic countries, there is a lack of trust in private news corporations in democratic countries because of concerns about the influence of ownership.”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsfati, Y., & Ariely, G.
- Venue
- Communication Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-05-02
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 760-782
- ISSN
- 0093-6502 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3810
- OpenAlex
- W2144715428
- Cited by
- 354
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 23.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.