Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 384

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dispositional Forgivingness: Development and Construct Validity of the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF)

Berry, Jack W., Worthington, Everett L., Parrott, Les, O’Connor, Lynn E., Wade, Nathaniel G.·2001·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/01461672012710004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Forgivingness is the disposition to forgive interpersonal transgressions over time and across situations. There is currently no acceptable measure of forgivingness for use in testing theoretical propositions. The authors describe a five-item scenario-based scale, the Transgression Narrative Test of Forgivingness (TNTF). In five studies examining 518 university students from three disparate universities, the authors assess the item and full-scale functioning of the TNTF and its concurrent and 8- week predictive validity relative to trait anger, rumination, neuroticism, agreeableness, and hostility. Test-retest reliability and stability of item locations were both good. Norms are presented by gender, ethnicity, and religious activity. The TNTF is a brief measure of forgivingness that is not theory dependent and is therefore useful in basic and intervention research from a variety of theoretical perspectives.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/01461672012710004

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7_15 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/BF02293814 · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1531 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S1090-5138(98)00009-9 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.5.851 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.497 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Boon, S. D., 1997, Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 19
  8. 10.1016/0191-8869(86)90074-7 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0191-8869(92)90193-S · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0191-8869(96)00248-6 · DOI
  11. Crowne, D. P., 1979, The experimental study of personality
  12. Davila, J., 1998, Handbook of family psychopathology
  13. 10.1111/1467-6427.00069 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1656 · DOI
  15. Draba, R. E., 1977, The identification and interpretation of item bias
  16. 10.1177/0146167293195015 · DOI
  17. Emmons, R. A., 2000, Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice, 156
  18. Enright, R. D., 1998, Exploring forgiveness
  19. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4230-7 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.1177/0146167294206007 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.958 · DOI
  22. 10.2307/3511971 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.820 · DOI
  24. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1995.tb02618.x · DOI
  25. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1997.tb00230.x · DOI
  26. 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.300 · DOI
  27. 10.1037/h0087831 · DOI
  28. John, O. P., 1990, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 66
  29. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M. & Kentle, R. (1992). The Big-Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54 (Tech. Rep.). Berkeley: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research. · DOI
  30. 10.1007/BF00848374 · DOI
  31. Larson, D. B., 1998, Scientific research on spirituality and health: A consensus report
  32. 10.2307/1388151 · DOI
  33. Mauger, P. A., 1992, Journal of Psychology and Christianity, 11, 170
  34. McAdams, D. P., 1994, The person: An introduction to personality psychology
  35. 10.1521/jscp.2000.19.1.43 · DOI · Paper page
  36. McCullough, M. E., 1998, Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives, 193
  37. McCullough, M. E., 2000, The frontiers of forgiving: Conceptual, empirical, and clinical perspectives
  38. McCullough, M. E., 2000, The frontiers of forgiveness: Theoretical, empirical, and clinical perspectives, 65
  39. 10.1111/1467-6494.00085 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/0022-3514.73.2.321 · DOI · Paper page
  41. Rasch, G., 1960, Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests
  42. 10.1146/annurev.ps.46.020195.001455 · DOI
  43. Roberts, R. C., 1995, American Philosophical Quarterly, 32, 289
  44. 10.1177/009164710002800102 · DOI
  45. Schonbach, P., 1990, Account episodes: The management and escalation of conflict
  46. 10.1080/10705519609540027 · DOI
  47. Spielberger, C. D., 1983, Advances in personality assessment, 161
  48. 10.1006/jado.1995.1045 · DOI
  49. 10.1037/0022-3514.70.4.797 · DOI
  50. Thoresen, C. E., 1998, The emerging role of counseling psychology in health care, 94
  51. Thoresen, C. E., 2000, Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice, 254
  52. Thoresen, C. E., 1998, Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological speculations, 163
  53. 10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.674 · DOI
  54. Wade, S. H. (1989). The development of a scale to measure forgiveness . Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fuller Theological Seminary, Pasadena, CA.
  55. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1991.tb00777.x · DOI
  56. Williams, R., 1989, The trusting heart
  57. Worthington, E. L., Jr., 1998, Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives
  58. Worthington, E. L., Jr., 1998, Dimensions of forgiveness: Psychological research and theological perspectives, 29
  59. Worthington, E. L., Jr., 2000, Forgiveness: Theory, research, and practice, 228
  60. 10.1521/jscp.1999.18.4.385 · DOI
  61. Wright, B. D., 1996, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 9, 468
  62. Wright, B. D., 1975, Better procedures for sample-free item analysis
  63. Wright, B. D., 1994, Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8, 370

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Berry, J. W., Worthington, E. L., Parrott, L., O’Connor, L. E., & Wade, N. G.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2001-10
Volume
27
Issue
10
Pages
1277-1290
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/01461672012710004
OpenAlex
W2075532481
Cited by
384
References
6
FWCI
16.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.