The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective
Abstract
Adopting an intergroup perspective, the research was designed to examine predictors of employee responses to an organizational merger. Data were collected from 465 fleet staff employed in a newly merged airline company. As predicted from social identity theory, the negative effects of the merger were most marked for employees of the low-status premerger organization. Also, as predicted, the perception of permeable intergroup boundaries in the new organization was associated positively with identification with the new organization and both job-related and person-related outcomes among employees of the low-status premerger organization but negatively with person-related outcomes among employees of the high-status premerger organization. As predicted, there was some evidence that the main and interactive effects involving status, perceived permeability, and intergroup contact on employee adjustment were mediated through strength of identification with the new organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949
Group norms and the attitude-behavior relationship: A role for group identification
Terry, D. J., & Hogg, M. A. (1996) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167296228002 · Cited by 1,444
Self-citationRevisiting the contact hypothesis: The induction of a common ingroup identity
Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., & Bachman, B. A. (1996) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(96)00019-3 · Cited by 430
Tajfel, H. (1975) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847501400204 · Cited by 198
Cited by
Hogg, M. A. (2000) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/14792772043000040 · Cited by 1,011
Hogg, M. A. (2007) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(06)39002-8 · Cited by 990
Taking the strain: Social identity, social support, and the experience of stress
Haslam, S. A., O'Brien, A., Jetten, J., Vormedal, K., & Penna, S. (2005) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466605x37468 · Cited by 771
Kavanagh, M. H., & Ashkanasy, N. M. (2006) · British Journal of Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00480.x · Cited by 585
Stressing the group: Social identity and the unfolding dynamics of responses to stress.
Haslam, S. A., & Reicher, S. (2006) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.1037 · Cited by 502
Metadata
- Authors
- Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-03
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 267-280
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2029304048
- Cited by
- 243
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 39.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167201273001
- The paper
- Terry, D. J., Carey, C. J., & Callan, V. J. (2001). Employee Adjustment to an Organizational Merger: An Intergroup Perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201273001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
