The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Empirical Comparison of Acculturation Models
Abstract
The unidirectional and bidirectional models of acculturation were compared in a sample of 291 Asian Americans. Both models produced good predictions of Asian preferences, cultural knowledge, ethnic identification, and generational status. The bidirectional model, however, failed to demonstrate its reputed independence across home culture and host culture orientations. The unidirectional model is recommended as an economical proxy measure of acculturation, the bidirectional model is recommended for full theoretical investigations of acculturation, and a speculative tridirectional model is proposed to clarify the distinction between acculturation and ethnogenesis (the creation of a new ethnicity).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Global Measure of Perceived Stress
Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.2307/2136404 · Cited by 32,807
The Multigroup Ethnic Identity Measure: A New Scale for Use with Diverse Groups
Phinney, J. S. (1992) · Journal of Adolescent Research · doi:10.1177/074355489272003 · Cited by 3,813
Ryder, A. G., Alden, L. E., & Paulhus, D. L. (2000) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.49 · Cited by 1,575
The Meaning of “Being Chinese” and “Being American”: Variation among Chinese American Young Adults
Tsai, J. L., Ying, Y.-W., & Lee, P. A. (2000) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022100031003002 · Cited by 502
Personality variation and values endorsement in Chinese University students
Luk, C. L., & Bond, M. H. (1993) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90312-q · Cited by 74 · cited 1×
“The traits of Extroversion and Openness have differential manifestation in Asian versus Western cultures (Luk & Bond, 1993).”
Background
Cited by
Rethinking the concept of acculturation: Implications for theory and research.
Schwartz, S. J., Unger, J. B., Zamboanga, B. L., & Szapocznik, J. (2010) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0019330 · Cited by 2,226
Biculturalism and Adjustment: A Meta-Analysis
Nguyen, A.-M. D., & Benet-Martínez, V. (2013) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022111435097 · Cited by 992
Consumer attitudes toward marketplace globalization: Structure, antecedents and consequences
Alden, D. L., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M., & Batra, R. (2006) · International Journal of Research in Marketing · doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2006.01.010 · Cited by 476
Multiculturalism and acculturation: views of Dutch and Turkish–Dutch
Arends‐Tóth, J., & Vijver, F. J. R. V. D. (2003) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.143 · Cited by 469
Schwartz, S. J., Zamboanga, B. L., & Jarvis, L. H. (2007) · Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology · doi:10.1037/1099-9809.13.4.364 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Flannery, W. P., Reise, S. P., & Yu, J.
- Venue
- Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-08
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1035-1045
- ISSN
- 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7433
- OpenAlex
- W2040238076
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Empirical Comparison of Acculturation Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0146167201278010
- The paper
- Flannery, W. P., Reise, S. P., & Yu, J. (2001). An Empirical Comparison of Acculturation Models. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201278010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
