Cited by 282Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsBehavioral Health and InterventionsHuman Behavior and Motivation

From Psychological Need Satisfaction to Intentional Behavior: Testing a Motivational Sequence in Two Behavioral Contexts

Hagger, Martin S., Chatzisarantis, Nikos L. D., Harris, Jemma·2006·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

The present study tested a motivational sequence in which global-level psychological need satisfaction from self-determination theory influenced intentions and behavior directly and indirectly through contextual-level motivation and situational-level decision-making constructs from the theory of planned behavior. Two samples of university students (N = 511) completed measures of global-level psychological need satisfaction, contextual-level autonomous motivation, and situational-level attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control, intentions, and behavior in two behavioral contexts: exercise and dieting. A structural equation model supported the proposed sequence in both samples. The indirect effect was present for exercise behavior, whereas both direct and indirect effects were found for dieting behavior. Findings independently supported the component theories and provided a comprehensive integrated explanation of volitional behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167205279905

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Self-determination theory (SDT) is uniquely placed among theories of human motivation to examine the differential effects of qualitatively different types of motivation that can underlie behavior.

    “Self-determination theory (SDT) is uniquely placed among theories of human motivation to examine the differential effects of qualitatively different types of motivation that can underlie behavior [12].”
  • Introjected regulation is generally theorized to be associated with more maladaptive outcomes such as negative affect, feelings of guilt, and lowered self-esteem.

    “This internally controlling form of regulation is generally theorized to be associated with more maladaptive outcomes such as negative affect, feelings of guilt, and lowered self-esteem [12].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hagger, M. S., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Harris, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Essex (GB)
Corresponding author
Hagger, Martin S.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2006-02
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
131-148
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2153198188
Cited by
282
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 21
FWCI
13.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Human Behavior and Motivation
Keywords
psychological need satisfaction, self-determination theory, theory of planned behavior, autonomous motivation, behavioral intention, exercise behavior, dieting behavior, volitional behavior, attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control
MeSH terms
Adult, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Motivation, Personal Satisfaction, Prospective Studies, Psychological Tests, Psychological Theory, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Behavior, Personal Autonomy, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review