Cited by 13Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionParanormal Experiences and BeliefsReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

It’s the End of the World and I Feel Fine: Soul Belief and Perceptions of End-of-the-World Scenarios

Lifshin, Uri, Greenberg, Jeff, Weise, David, Soenke, Melissa·2016·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin

Abstract

Five studies tested the effects that soul beliefs have on reactions to end-of-the-world scenarios. In Studies 1 and 2, participants who firmly believe in an immortal soul showed less resistance to an article predicting the end of humanity than those without such belief. However, in Studies 3 to 5, thoughts of symbolic immortality made soul believers more resistant to scientific evidence predicting the end of humanity. These results suggest that belief in an immortal soul provides psychological protection against the threat of humanity's demise that does not hold for symbolic immortality beliefs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167215616800

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Based on random assignment, participants in Study 1 wrote about the end of the world (n = 47), losing all social bonds (n = 60), a classic MS prime (n = 55), or dental pain (n = 41).

    “Based on random assignment, participants wrote about the end of the world and all human life (“all human life suddenly comes to an end;” n = 47), based on previous work [60], about losing all social bonds (“losing all of your friends and family;” n = 60), which was novel to this study to address the main hypotheses, a classic MS prime (n = 55), or about dental pain (n = 41).”
  • Other reviewed studies referred to climate change threats in near vs. future scenarios (e.g., 50 vs. 200 years from now).

    “Some studies had participants envision climate change threat, at times with detailed prompts - rising sea levels from melting ice caps, food scarcity, droughts, floods (Uhl et al., 2018) - while others referred to climate change threats in near vs. future scenarios (e.g., 50 vs. 200 years from now; Lifshin et al., 2016).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lifshin, U., Greenberg, J., Weise, D., & Soenke, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Arizona (US)
  • Texas Christian University (US)
  • California State University, Channel Islands (US)
Corresponding author
Lifshin, Uri
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Published
2015-11-27
Volume
42
Issue
1
Pages
104-117
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
OpenAlex
W2306083289
Cited by
13
References
37
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
soul beliefs, immortality of the soul, symbolic immortality, end-of-the-world scenarios, psychological protection, belief in immortality, existential risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, Female, Humans, Male, Religion, Mind-Body Relations, Metaphysical, Spirituality, Young Adult, Global Warming

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review