Cited by 85Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsAging and Gerontology Research

Does devoutness delay death? Psychological investment in religion and its association with longevity in the Terman sample.

McCullough, Michael E., Friedman, Howard S., Enders, Craig K., Martin, Leslie R.·2009·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Religious people tend to live slightly longer lives (M. E. McCullough, W. T. Hoyt, D. B. Larson, H. G. Koenig, & C. E. Thoresen, 2000). On the basis of the principle of social investment (J. Lodi-Smith & B. W. Roberts, 2007), the authors sought to clarify this phenomenon with a study of religion and longevity that (a) incorporated measures of psychological religious commitment; (b) considered religious change over the life course; and (c) examined 19 measures of personality traits, social ties, health behaviors, and mental and physical health that might help to explain the religion-longevity association. Discrete-time survival growth mixture models revealed that women (but not men) with the lowest degrees of religiousness through adulthood had shorter lives than did women who were more religious. Survival differences were largely attributable to cross-sectional and prospective between-class differences in personality traits, social ties, health behaviors, and mental and physical health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0016366

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level).

    “Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level) [548–566], whereas three (5%) reported shorter longevity [567–569].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCullough, M. E., Friedman, H. S., Enders, C. K., & Martin, L. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Miami (US)
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • La Sierra University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2009-11
Volume
97
Issue
5
Pages
866-882
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2063003768
Cited by
85
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • John Templeton Foundation
  • Metanexus Institute
  • Emory University
  • National Institutes of Health (AG08825)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
religious devotion, longevity, mortality, social investment, religious commitment, personality traits, social ties, health behavior, mental health, physical health, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Character, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longevity, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Prospective Studies, Religion and Psychology, Sex Factors, Social Adjustment, Social Identification, Health Behavior, Proportional Hazards Models, Survival Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review