Cited by 87Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyDeath, Funerary Practices, and Mourning

Exploring the existential function of religion: The effect of religious fundamentalism and mortality salience on faith-based medical refusals.

Vess, Matthew, Arndt, Jamie, Cox, Cathy R., Routledge, Clay, Goldenberg, Jamie L.·2009·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Decisions to rely on religious faith over medical treatment for health conditions represent an important but understudied phenomenon. In an effort to understand some of the psychological underpinnings of such decisions, the present research builds from terror management theory to examine whether reminders of death motivate individuals strongly invested in a religious worldview (i.e., fundamentalists) to rely on religious beliefs when making medical decisions. The results showed that heightened concerns about mortality led those high in religious fundamentalism to express greater endorsement of prayer as a medical substitute (Study 1) and to perceive prayer as a more effective medical treatment (Study 2). Similarly, high fundamentalists were more supportive of religiously motivated medical refusals (Study 3) and reported an increased willingness to rely on faith alone for medical treatment (Study 4) following reminders of death. Finally, affirmations of the legitimacy of divine intervention in health contexts functioned to solidify a sense of existential meaning among fundamentalists who were reminded of personal mortality (Study 5). The existential importance of religious faith and the health-relevant implications of these findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0015545

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mortality salience has increased fundamentalists' willingness to refuse modern medical treatment in favor of religious treatments.

    “increased fundamentalists' willingness to refuse modern medical treatment in favor of religious treatments [20];”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vess, M., Arndt, J., Cox, C. R., Routledge, C., & Goldenberg, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2009
Volume
97
Issue
2
Pages
334-350
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2087742555
Cited by
87
References
81
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
9.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (R01 CA96581)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
Keywords
religious fundamentalism, mortality salience, terror management theory, existential meaning, religious worldview, clinical decision-making, religious coping
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Attitude to Death, Decision Making, Existentialism, Female, Humans, Male, Missouri, Religion, Religion and Psychology, Students, Treatment Refusal, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review