CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 281Personality Traits and PsychologySocial and Intergroup PsychologyEmotions and Moral Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Narcissism and Self-Evaluation Maintenance: Explorations in Object Relations

Morf, Carolnm C., Rhodewalt, Frederik·1993·Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
DOI 10.1177/0146167293196001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined effects of threat to the sef on efforts to maintain a positive self-evaluation in individuals with varying levels of narcissism. Male students (N= 216) with varying levels of narcissism, as measured by the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, were given feedback that they had been either slightly or substantially outperformed on an ego-relevant task. Subjects completed personality ratings of the better-performing other believing that the other would or would not see the evaluation. According to Tesser's self-evaluation maintenance model, one way to reduce threat from a better-performing other is to derogate the other More narcissistic individuals reacted to such a threat to self by rating the other more negatively than less narcissistic individuals. However, in contrast to prediction, narcissists were somewhat less negative in public than in private. Discussion centers on the utility of translating a psychoanalytic construct into social cognitive processes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0146167293196001

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Judd, C. M., 1981, Estimating the effects of social interacto
  2. Kernberg, O., 1975, Borderline conditions and pathologicl narcissism
  3. Kohut, H., 1971, The analysis of the self
  4. Kohut, H., 1976, The restoration of the self
  5. Lasch, C. L., 1979, The culture of narcissism
  6. Pedhazur, E. J., 1982, Multipk regression in behavioral search
  7. Rosenthal, R., 1979, Sesitivity to nonverbal communication: The PONS test
  8. Tesser, A., 1991, The relational self Theretical convergences in psychoanalysis and social psychology, 257
  9. Tesser, A., 1991, Journal of & mental Social Psychology, 27, 501
  10. Westen, D., 1991, Psychological Bulltin, 109, 1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 281

Related

Metadata

Authors
Morf, C. C., & Rhodewalt, F.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
1993-12
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
668-676
ISSN
  • 0146-1672 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7433
DOI
10.1177/0146167293196001
OpenAlex
W2136006907
Cited by
281
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 14
FWCI
1.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotions and Moral Behavior
Keywords
narcissism, social comparison, Narcissistic Personality Inventory, object relations, social cognition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review