The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Etiology of the Multilevel Paradigm in Management Research
Abstract
As initially spawned through the meso movement in organizational behavior, the multilevel paradigm has permeated virtually every subdiscipline of management. The authors review its evolution from different disciplinary origins in terms of theory, measurement and construct validity, and design and analysis. They illustrate that although its origins are disparate and multidisciplinary, the modern-day multilevel paradigm is coherent and well entrenched in modern management research. They then raise five challenges to the current paradigm in terms of the following: first, the ambiguities surrounding the units of inquiry; second, the violations of the nesting assumption; third, the need to integrate the nested-arrangements approach with the longitudinal approach; fourth, the challenges associated with modeling current and future multilevel models; and, fifth, the role of multidisciplinary influences for multilevel management theory and investigations. Their hope is that this article will spark a paradigm shift in multilevel management research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.1.85 · Cited by 4,774
Centering predictor variables in cross-sectional multilevel models: A new look at an old issue.
Enders, C. K., & Tofighi, D. (2007) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.12.2.121 · Cited by 4,462
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Self-citationAnswers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement
LeBreton, J. M., & Senter, J. L. (2008) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428106296642 · Cited by 3,608 · cited 1×
“(2002), LeBreton and Senter (2008) Differentiated the nature of interrater reliability and interrater”
Backgroundrwg: an assessment of within-group interrater agreement
James, L. R., Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306 · Cited by 2,221
Bauer, D. J., Preacher, K. J., & Gil, K. M. (2006) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.11.2.142 · Cited by 1,704
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
Glick, W. H. (1985) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1985.4279045 · Cited by 1,286
Ancona, D. G., Goodman, P. S., Lawrence, B. S., & Tushman, M. L. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/3560246 · Cited by 870
Cited by
Common method bias: It’ s bad, it’ s complex, it’ s widespread, and it’ s not easy to fix
Podsakoff, P. M., Podsakoff, N. P., Williams, L. J., Huang, C., & Yang, J. (2024) · Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-040030 · Cited by 1,899
Bankins, S., Ocampo, A. C., Marrone, M., Restubog, S. L. D., & Woo, S. E. (2024) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2735 · Cited by 799
A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology.
Mathieu, J. E., Hollenbeck, J. R., van Knippenberg, D., & Ilgen, D. R. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000128 · Cited by 593
Self-citationFrequently asked questions about the social licence to operate
Boutilier, R. G. (2014) · Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal · doi:10.1080/14615517.2014.941141 · Cited by 183
A 25-year perspective on levels of analysis in leadership research
Dionne, S. D., Gupta, A., Sotak, K. L., Shirreffs, K. A., Serban, A., Hao, C., Kim, D. H., & Yammarino, F. J. (2014) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.002 · Cited by 141
Gooty, J., Serban, A., Thomas, J. S., Gavin, M. B., & Yammarino, F. J. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.002 · Cited by 71
Meta-emotions in daily life: Associations with emotional awareness and depression
Bailen, N. H., Wu, H., & Thompson, R. J. (2019) · Emotion · doi:10.1037/emo0000488 · Cited by 70
Contracted time and expanded space: the impact of circumnavigation on judgements of space and time
Brunec, I. K., Javadi, A.-H., Zisch, F. E. L., & Spiers, H. J. (2017) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.004 · Cited by 37
Critical positions: Situating critical perspectives in work and Organizational Psychology
Islam, G., & Sanderson, Z. (2022) · Organizational Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/20413866211038044 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Mathieu, J. E., & Chen, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-03-26
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 610-641
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2079184392
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 21.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
