Cited by 37Spatial Cognition and NavigationMemory and Neural MechanismsGeography Education and Pedagogy

Contracted time and expanded space: the impact of circumnavigation on judgements of space and time

Open access
Brunec, Iva K., Javadi, Amir-Homayoun, Zisch, Fiona E.L., Spiers, Hugo J.·2017·Cognition

Abstract

The ability to estimate distance and time to spatial goals is fundamental for survival. In cases where a region of space must be navigated around to reach a location (circumnavigation), the distance along the path is greater than the straight-line Euclidean distance. To explore how such circumnavigation impacts on estimates of distance and time, we tested participants on their ability to estimate travel time and Euclidean distance to learned destinations in a virtual town. Estimates for approximately linear routes were compared with estimates for routes requiring circumnavigation. For all routes, travel times were significantly underestimated, and Euclidean distances overestimated. For routes requiring circumnavigation, travel time was further underestimated and the Euclidean distance further overestimated. Thus, circumnavigation appears to enhance existing biases in representations of travel time and distance.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brunec, I. K., Javadi, A.-H., Zisch, F. E. L., & Spiers, H. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Spiers, Hugo J.
Venue
Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
166
Pages
425-432
ISSN
0010-0277 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2626061768
Cited by
37
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (094850/Z/10/Z)
  • James S. McDonnell Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Geography Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
circumnavigation, travel time estimation, distance estimation, spatial cognition, time perception, route planning, Euclidean distance, cognitive biases, spatial navigation
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Distance Perception, Female, Humans, Judgment, Male, Memory, Space Perception, Time Perception, Young Adult, Spatial Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review