The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS)
Abstract
The 21st century has been marked by a focus on employee development and continuous learning to engage and retain employees. To stay competitive, organizations must to move away from a one-size-fits-all approach to employee development. Organizations are challenged to understand the unique needs and motivators of each individual. Effectively using performance feedback in a way that addresses individual differences can be a competitive advantage to support engaging work environments. Given the impact of the feedback recipient on the feedback process, it is important to understand individual differences in how people respond to feedback. Feedback orientation, a construct proposed by London and Smither, is an individual’s overall receptivity to feedback. The current research developed and validated a multidimensional measure of feedback orientation. This new instrument will be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners to better understand individual differences in the feedback process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.57.9.705 · Cited by 7,766 · cited 5×
“This dimension is based on London and Smither’s (2002) dimension titled “feeling accountable to act on feedback” (p. 83). Tetlock’s (1992) theory of accountability suggests that those who feel accountable will behave in ways to increase the likelihood that others will view them in a positive way. Accountability is see…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAttitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 · Cited by 7,611 · cited 10×
“As suggested by Ajzen and Fishbein (1977), perceived behavioral control has an important impact on behavior.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMotivational processes affecting learning.
Dweck, C. S. (1986) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.41.10.1040 · Cited by 6,971
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254 · Cited by 5,882
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
On the Self-Regulation of Behavior
Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174794 · Cited by 4,110
A Review of Scale Development Practices in the Study of Organizations
Hinkin, T. R. (1995) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920639502100509 · Cited by 3,193
Two-component models of socially desirable responding.
Paulhus, D. L. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598 · Cited by 3,013
Cited by
Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206318755303 · Cited by 173
Self-citationPersonifying programming tool feedback improves novice programmers' learning
Lee, M. J., & Ko, A. J. (2011) · Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research · doi:10.1145/2016911.2016934 · Cited by 125
Alqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0342-0 · Cited by 92
Brummer, L., de Boer, H., Mouw, J. M., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Learning Environments Research · doi:10.1007/s10984-024-09501-4 · Cited by 25
A reinforcement sensitivity theory view of seeking behaviors at work: A meta‐analysis
Sherf, E. N., Gilliam, N., & McElroy, T. (2024) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12579 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-06-28
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1372-1405
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2027444340
- Cited by
- 283
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 13.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206310373145
- The paper
- Linderbaum, B. A., & Levy, P. E. (2010). The Development and Validation of the Feedback Orientation Scale (FOS). Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373145
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
