Cited by 161Corporate Identity and ReputationSocial Power and Status DynamicsManagement and Organizational Studies

Reputation and Status: Expanding the Role of Social Evaluations in Management Research

Open access
George, Gerard, Dahlander, Linus, Graffin, Scott D., Sim, Samantha·2016·Academy of Management Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5465/amj.2016.4001

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being known for something causes stakeholders to interpret actors' actions differently and hold them to higher standards of accountability.

    “''being known for something'' causes stakeholders to interpret actors' actions differently and to hold such actors to higher standards of accountability”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
George, G., Dahlander, L., Graffin, S. D., & Sim, S.
Affiliations
  • Singapore Management University (SG)
  • European School of Management and Technology (DE)
  • University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Academy of Management Journal
Published
2016-02
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
1-13
ISSN
  • 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
  • 1948-0989
OpenAlex
W2293710855
Cited by
161
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2014: 1
FWCI
43.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
  • Singapore Management University Institutional Knowledge (InK) (Singapore Management University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Identity and Reputation
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
reputation, status, social evaluation, social status, reputation management, organizational reputation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review