Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 573

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations: Evidence and Impact

Cortina, Lilia M., Kabat-Farr, Dana, Leskinen, Emily A., Huerta, Marisela, Magley, Vicki J.·2013·Journal of Management

Abstract

This collection of studies tested aspects of Cortina’s theory of selective incivility as a “modern” manifestation of sexism and racism in the workplace and also tested an extension of that theory to ageism. Survey data came from employees in three organizations: a city government (N = 369), a law enforcement agency (N = 653), and the U.S. military (N = 15,497). According to analyses of simple mediation, target gender and race (but not age) affected vulnerability to uncivil treatment on the job, which in turn predicted intent to leave that job. Evidence of moderated mediation also emerged, with target gender and race interacting to predict uncivil experiences, such that women of color reported the worst treatment. The article concludes with implications for interventions to promote civility and nondiscrimination in organizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206311418835

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64 · doi:10.1037/1076-8998.6.1.64 · Paper page
  2. Dovidio J. F., 2001, Groups at work: Theory and research, 415
  3. Epstein C. F., 1973, Psychology Today, 3, 57
  4. 10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.80.6.652 · Paper page
  5. 10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578 · Paper page
  6. Glomb T. M., International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior
  7. 10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.14 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.14
  8. Helba C., 2001, Overview of the 1999 Survey of Active Duty Personnel
  9. Neuman J. H., 2004, The dark side of organizational behavior, 62
  10. Pearson C. M., 2004, The dark side of organizational behavior, 403
  11. Sears D. O., 1998, Confronting racism: The problem and the response, 76
  12. Shore L. M., 2004, Discrimination at work, 203
  13. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1141 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1141

Cited by

See all 573

Metadata

Authors
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2011-09-01
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1579-1605
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2119033893
Cited by
573
References
102
FWCI
35.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations: Evidence and Impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0149206311418835
The paper
Cortina, L. M., Kabat-Farr, D., Leskinen, E. A., Huerta, M., & Magley, V. J. (2013). Selective Incivility as Modern Discrimination in Organizations: Evidence and Impact. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311418835

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.