Cited by 179Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorLeadership and Management in OrganizationsSocial Power and Status Dynamics

The impact of situational vulnerability on the development and erosion of followers' trust in their leader

Lapidot, Yael, Kark, Ronit, Shamir, Boas·2007·The Leadership Quarterly

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.11.004

Cites

87 of 87 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The power differential and stronger hierarchical dependence inherent in the leader-follower relationship may result in a situation where issues such as care, concern and benevolence are more important for performance or citizenship.

    “The power differential and stronger hierarchical dependence inherent in the leader-follower relationship (Emerson, 1962; Lapidot et al., 2007) may result in a situation where issues such as care, concern and benevolence are more important for performance or citizenship.”

    From A meta-analysis of the role of trust in the leadership- performance relationship (2021) · cites this paper as Lapidot et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bigley, 1998, Straining for shared meaning in organizational science, Academy of Management Review, 23, 405, 10.2307/259286 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lapidot, Y., Kark, R., & Shamir, B.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Bar-Ilan University (IL)
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Lapidot, Yael
Venue
The Leadership Quarterly
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-02
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
16-34
ISSN
1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969226945
Cited by
177
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 11
FWCI
14.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Leadership Quarterly (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
trust in leadership, trust erosion, trust building, situational vulnerability, leadership integrity, critical incidents, military cadets, officer training, leadership behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review