The DOI matches its Crossref record, with a small difference in title or year; 68 of the 68 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Authentic Leadership, Authentic Followership, Basic Need Satisfaction, and Work Role Performance: A Cross-Level Study
Open accessAbstract
Authentic leadership occurs when individuals enact their true selves in their role as a leader. This article examines the role of authentic followership in the previously established relationship between authentic leadership and follower in-role and extrarole performance behaviors. Consideration of followers who enact their true selves is important to understand how authentic leadership fosters follower self-determined work motivation and thus work role performance. Using self-determination theory (SDT) as a guiding framework, the authors propose that authentic leadership, authentic followership, and their interplay are positively related to the satisfaction of followers’ basic needs, which, in turn, are positively related to follower work role performance. The authors conducted a survey study of 30 leaders and 252 followers in 25 Belgian service companies. The results provide evidence of positive relationship for both authentic leadership and authentic followership with follower basic need satisfaction in a cross-level model where authentic leadership was aggregated to the group level of analysis. Cross-level interaction results indicated that authentic leadership strengthened the relationship between authentic followership and follower basic need satisfaction. Follower basic need satisfaction was shown to mediate the relationship of authentic leadership and authentic followership with follower work role performance. A test of mediated moderation further demonstrated that basic need satisfaction mediates the interaction of authentic leadership and authentic followership on follower work role performance. The implications for leadership research and practice are explored.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In sum, authentic leaders maintain self-concordant moral freedom, thereby developing the authenticity and autonomy of followers (Gardner et al., 2005;Leroy, Anseel, Gardner, & Sels, 2015).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Leroy, Anseel, Gardner, & Sels, 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Authentic leadership may be strongest when it is combined with authentic followership, such that leaders and followers share their core values in a psychologically safe environment, assess their situations honestly and frankly, and work together to ensure fulfilling and productive experiences (Leroy et al., 2015).”
From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Leroy et al., 2015
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Empirical studies suggest that authentic leadership positively influences followers ' work attitudes and performance (e.g., Banks et al., 2016; Laschinger et al., 2013; Leroy et al., 2012).”
From The evolution of leadership: Past insights, present trends, and future directions (2025) · cites this paper as Leroy et al., 2012
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
RETRACTED: Psychological processes linking authentic leadership to follower behaviors
Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2010) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.07.015 · Cited by 458
RetractedWalumbwa, F. O., Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Oke, A. (2009) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.653 · Cited by 424
RetractedHu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 46,726
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1104_01 · Cited by 34,210
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams
Edmondson, A. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2666999 · Cited by 12,026
On Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Bliese P. D., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 349
- Hodgins H. S., 2002, Handbook of self-determination research, 87
- Hoffmann D., 2000, Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations, 467
- Muthén L. K., 1998, Mplus user’s guide
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A meta-analytic review of authentic and transformational leadership: A test for redundancy
Banks, G. C., McCauley, K. D., Gardner, W. L., & Guler, C. E. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.006 · Cited by 681
Self-citationLemoine, G. J., Hartnell, C. A., & Leroy, H. (2019) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0121 · Cited by 614
Self-citationChiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004 · Cited by 544
Leadership and followership identity processes: A multilevel review
Epitropaki, O., Kark, R., Mainemelis, C., & Lord, R. G. (2016) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.10.003 · Cited by 438
Mindfulness, authentic functioning, and work engagement: a growth modeling approach
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Dimitrova, N. G., & Sels, L. (2013) · Journal of Vocational Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.012 · Cited by 336
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Ghent University (BE)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2012-08-27
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1677-1697
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2129413260
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 68
- Citations by year
- 2026: 27 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 18.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- lirias.kuleuven.be
- Locations
- Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
- Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
- Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employee Performance and Leadership
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- authentic leadership, basic need satisfaction, self-determination theory, in-role performance, true self, service companies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
