Cited by 115Workplace Violence and BullyingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorBullying, Victimization, and Aggression

It’s not personal: A review and theoretical integration of research on vicarious workplace mistreatment

Dhanani, Lindsay Y., LaPalme, Matthew L.·2019·Journal of Management

Abstract

Recent advancements in the area of workplace mistreatment have begun to challenge our view of who is affected by this phenomenon. Whereas it was initially assumed that mistreatment affected a small subset of employees who were directly targeted by negative treatment, empirical work has documented that employees who observe or become aware of others being mistreated are also adversely affected. However, the extant literature examining vicarious mistreatment has developed in silos centered around individual mistreatment constructs and individual outcome domains, and there is currently little integration among these bodies of work. As such, this paper draws on a systematic review of empirical studies examining vicarious mistreatment to summarize its antecedents and outcomes. The review further enumerates the mechanisms that transmit the effects of vicarious mistreatment to third-party outcomes and the moderating variables that may mitigate or amplify the impact of vicarious mistreatment. The culmination of this review is the development of a dual process model of vicarious mistreatment that integrates prior theoretical perspectives into an overarching framework to guide subsequent research. The authors then conclude by providing a road map for future theoretical and empirical work on vicarious mistreatment. Included within the future research agenda is a constructive critique of current research designs and methodological approaches that may undermine the field’s understanding o…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206318816162

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Corresponding author
Dhanani, Lindsay Y.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2018-12-07
Volume
45
Issue
6
Pages
2322-2351
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2905403615
Cited by
115
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
FWCI
13.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
Keywords
workplace abuse, third-party effects, dual-process models, moderators, transmission mechanism, workplace harassment, employee well-being

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review