It’s not personal: A review and theoretical integration of research on vicarious workplace mistreatment
Abstract
Recent advancements in the area of workplace mistreatment have begun to challenge our view of who is affected by this phenomenon. Whereas it was initially assumed that mistreatment affected a small subset of employees who were directly targeted by negative treatment, empirical work has documented that employees who observe or become aware of others being mistreated are also adversely affected. However, the extant literature examining vicarious mistreatment has developed in silos centered around individual mistreatment constructs and individual outcome domains, and there is currently little integration among these bodies of work. As such, this paper draws on a systematic review of empirical studies examining vicarious mistreatment to summarize its antecedents and outcomes. The review further enumerates the mechanisms that transmit the effects of vicarious mistreatment to third-party outcomes and the moderating variables that may mitigate or amplify the impact of vicarious mistreatment. The culmination of this review is the development of a dual process model of vicarious mistreatment that integrates prior theoretical perspectives into an overarching framework to guide subsequent research. The authors then conclude by providing a road map for future theoretical and empirical work on vicarious mistreatment. Included within the future research agenda is a constructive critique of current research designs and methodological approaches that may undermine the field’s understanding o…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Observers can engage in antisocial behaviors not only against the perpetrator but also against the organization itself.
“Moreover, Dhanani and LaPalme (2019) underline that observers can engage in antisocial behaviors not only against the perpetrator but also against the organization itself.”
From Blame or Justification: A Conceptual Model of How Attributions Shape Observers’ Deviant Responses to Abusive Supervision (2026) · cites this paper as Dhanani & LaPalme, 2019
Vicarious mistreatment increases overall levels of negative behavior, which could also involve behavior towards the victim that cannot be explained via a deontic perspective.
“vicarious mistreatment increases overall levels of negative behavior, which could also involve behavior (e.g., towards the victim) that cannot be explained via a deontic perspective.”
From Blame or Justification: A Conceptual Model of How Attributions Shape Observers’ Deviant Responses to Abusive Supervision (2026) · cites this paper as Dhanani & LaPalme, 2019
The attribution process is a more time-consuming reasoning process than deontic moral reasoning.
“Deontic moral reasoning process takes place unconsciously and rapidly (Dhanani & LaPalme, 2019), but the attribution process is a more time-consuming reasoning process (Kelley & Michela, 1980).”
From Blame or Justification: A Conceptual Model of How Attributions Shape Observers’ Deviant Responses to Abusive Supervision (2026) · cites this paper as Dhanani & LaPalme, 2019
Cites
Dual-Processing Accounts of Reasoning, Judgment, and Social Cognition
Evans, J. S. B. T. (2008) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093629 · Cited by 5,137 · see citing works
A Relational Model of Authority in Groups
Tyler, T. R., & Lind, E. A. (1992) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60283-x · Cited by 2,977 · see citing works
Lerner, M. J. (1980) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-0448-5 · Cited by 2,656 · see citing works
Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197 · Cited by 2,517 · see citing works
Group inhibition of bystander intervention in emergencies.
Latane, B., & Darley, J. M. (1968) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0026570 · Cited by 1,252 · see citing works
Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers
Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000002 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village
Mayer, D. M., Nurmohamed, S., Treviño, L. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Schminke, M. (2013) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.002 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
An Investigation of Abusive Supervision, Vicarious Abusive Supervision, and Their Joint Impacts
Harris, K. J., Harvey, P., Harris, R. B., & Cast, M. (2013) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/00224545.2012.703709 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ağaoğlu, M., & Erdil, O. (2026) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs16071191
- Authors
- Dhanani, L. Y., & LaPalme, M. L.
- Affiliations
- Ohio University (US)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dhanani, Lindsay Y.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-07
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2322-2351
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2905403615
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 13.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Keywords
- workplace abuse, third-party effects, dual-process models, moderators, transmission mechanism, workplace harassment, employee well-being
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review