Cited by 245Ethics in Business and EducationJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in medical practice

Encouraging employees to report unethical conduct internally: It takes a village

Open access
Mayer, David M., Nurmohamed, Samir, Treviño, Linda Klebe, Shapiro, Debra L., Schminke, Marshall·2013·Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.obhdp.2013.01.002

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ethical teammates may be a necessary precondition for ethical leadership to affect whistle-blowing.

    “Ethical leadership most powerfully impacts outcomes such as whistle-blowing when followers are focused more on rules than on the consequences of their actions (Bhal & Dadhich, 2011), and ethical teammates may be a necessary precondition for ethical leadership to affect whistle-blowing (Mayer et al., 2013).”
  • Ethical leadership most powerfully impacts outcomes such as whistle-blowing when followers are focused more on rules than on the consequences of their actions.

    “Ethical leadership most powerfully impacts outcomes such as whistle-blowing when followers are focused more on rules than on the consequences of their actions (Bhal & Dadhich, 2011), and ethical teammates may be a necessary precondition for ethical leadership to affect whistle-blowing (Mayer et al., 2013).”
  • A compliance culture mediates ethical leadership's impact on rule compliance and within-organization whistle-blowing.

    “A compliance culture also mediates ethical leadership's impact on rule compliance and withinorganization whistle-blowing (Mayer, Nurmohamed, Treviño, Shapiro, & Schminke, 2013;Schaubroeck et al., 2012).”

    From Taking Stock of Moral Approaches to Leadership: An Integrative Review of Ethical, Authentic, and Servant Leadership (2019) · cites this paper as Mayer, Nurmohamed, Treviño, Shapiro, & Schminke, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mayer, D. M., Nurmohamed, S., Treviño, L. K., Shapiro, D. L., & Schminke, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Mayer, David M.
Venue
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-05
Volume
121
Issue
1
Pages
89-103
ISSN
0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130891108
Cited by
244
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6
FWCI
28.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
Keywords
internal whistleblowing, unethical behavior, social influence, fear of retaliation, organizational ethics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review