Cited by 337Workplace Violence and BullyingJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEthics in Business and Education

Third parties’ reactions to the abusive supervision of coworkers

Open access
Mitchell, Marie S., Vogel, Ryan M., Folger, Robert·2015·Journal of Applied Psychology

Abstract

This research examines 3rd parties' reactions to the abusive supervision of a coworker. Reactions were theorized to depend on 3rd parties' beliefs about the targeted coworker and, specifically, whether the target of abuse was considered deserving of mistreatment. We predicted that 3rd parties would experience anger when targets of abuse were considered undeserving of mistreatment; angered 3rd parties would then be motivated to harm the abusive supervisor and support the targeted coworker. Conversely, we predicted that 3rd parties would experience contentment when targets of abuse were considered deserving of mistreatment; contented 3rd parties would then be motivated to exclude the targeted coworker. Additionally, we predicted that 3rd parties' moral identity would moderate the effects of 3rd parties' experienced emotions on their behavioral reactions, such that a strong moral identity would strengthen ethical behavior (i.e., coworker support) and weaken harmful behavior (i.e., supervisor-directed deviance, coworker exclusion). Moderated mediation results supported the predictions. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/apl0000002

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 103 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mitchell, M. S., Vogel, R. M., & Folger, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Georgia (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • University of Central Florida (US)
Venue
Journal of Applied Psychology
Published
2015-07
Volume
100
Issue
4
Pages
1040-1055
ISSN
  • 0021-9010 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1854
OpenAlex
W1964402930
Cited by
337
References
103
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 44 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
33.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Georgia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Workplace Violence and Bullying
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Ethics in Business and Education
Keywords
abusive supervision, third-party reactions, deservingness, anger, contentment, coworker support, moral identity, workplace ethics, moderated mediation
MeSH terms
Adult, Employment, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Personnel Management, Social Support, Bullying

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review