The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Implications of Controversy Research for Management
Abstract
Several researchers have documented that controversy in which opposing views are openly discussed can contribute to decision making. A series of experimental andfield studies by the author and his associates has identified the dynamics of controversy and specified interpersonal conditions that affect controversy's outcomes. Findings indicate that controversy must be well managed before it is productive and must suggest the procedures and skills needed to make problemsolving groups effective. Controversy occurs in many organizational settings, but its potential role has been largely overlooked. This review suggests the implications of controversy research for strategic decision making, performance appraisal, and participation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective
Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (1997) · Reis · doi:10.2307/40183951 · Cited by 11,113
Cited by
Making fast strategic decisions in high-velocity environments
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256434 · Cited by 3,818
Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams
Kozlowski, S. W. J., & Ilgen, D. R. (2006) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x · Cited by 2,623
A Temporally Based Framework and Taxonomy of Team Processes
Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/259182 · Cited by 3,659
Demographic Diversity, Conflict, and Work Group Outcomes: An Intervening Process Theory
Pelled, L. H. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.6.615 · Cited by 1,489
MAKING USE OF DIFFERENCE: DIVERSITY, DEBATE, AND DECISION COMPREHENSIVENESS IN TOP MANAGEMENT TEAMS.
Simons, T., Pelled, L. H., & Smith, K. A. (1999) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256987 · Cited by 1,235
Conflict amid Community: The Micropolitics of Teacher Collaboration
Achinstein, B. (2002) · Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9620.00168 · Cited by 570
Positive effects of conflict: a cognitive perspective
Baron, R. A. (1991) · Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal · doi:10.1007/bf01390436 · Cited by 224
POSITIVE EFFECTS OF CONFLICT: A FIELD ASSESSMENT
Cosier, R. A., & Dalton, D. R. (1990) · International Journal of Conflict Management · doi:10.1108/eb022674 · Cited by 74
Metadata
- Authors
- Tjosvold, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1985-09
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 21-37
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W2079597752
- Cited by
- 269
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
