Cited by 224Conflict Management and NegotiationTeam Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Positive effects of conflict: a cognitive perspective

Baron, Robert A.·1991·Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf01390436

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The motivation or pressure to maintain a consistently positive group emotion discourages dissent and constructive conflict, thereby hindering the robust information exchange and critical evaluation vital for high-quality decisions.

    “This pressure discourages dissent and constructive conflict, thereby hindering the robust information exchange and critical evaluation vital for high-quality decisions (Baron, 1991, 1997; Cosier and Dalton, 1990).”

    From The Groupfeel syndrome: a theory of a counterproductive group emotion (2026) · cites this paper as Baron, 1991

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baron, R. A.
Affiliations
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Baron, Robert A.
Venue
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal
Published
1991-03
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
25-36
ISSN
  • 0892-7545 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3378
OpenAlex
W2002182719
Cited by
224
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 12
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conflict Management and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
workplace conflict, managers' perceptions, human cognition, negative emotions, stereotypes, attribution, conflict management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review