The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment as Predictors of Organizational Citizenship and In-Role Behaviors
Abstract
Previous organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) research (a) has not demonstrated that extra-role behaviors can be distinguished empirically from in-role activities, and (b) has not examined the relative contributions of components ofjob satisfaction a nd organizational commitment to the performance of OCBs. Factor analysis of survey data from 127 employees' supervisors supported the distinction between in-role behaviors and two forms of OCBs. Hierarchical regression analysis found two job cognitions variables (intrinsic and extrinsic) to be differentially related to the two types OCBs, but affective variables and organizational commitment were not significant predictors. The link between the present findings and previous research is discussed, as are directions forfuture research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Items 101–110 of 110
Thiel, C. E., McClean, S., Harvey, J., & Prince, N. (2023) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.2748 · Cited by 41
Letwin, C., Wo, D., Folger, R., Rice, D., Taylor, R., Richard, B., & Taylor, S. (2016) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2747-5 · Cited by 32
A social exchange perspective for achieving safety culture in healthcare organizations
Trinchero, E., Farr-Wharton, B., & Brunetto, Y. (2019) · International Journal of Public Sector Management · doi:10.1108/ijpsm-06-2017-0168 · Cited by 27
Desselle, S. P., & Semsick, G. R. (2016) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe8010168 · Cited by 21
Zadow, A., Loh, M. Y., Dollard, M. F., Mathisen, G. E., & Yantcheva, B. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1082283 · Cited by 20
Ali, Z., & Mehreen, A. (2019) · Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship · doi:10.1108/ebhrm-11-2018-0069 · Cited by 19
Liu, X., Zheng, X., Zhang, Y., Liao, H., Harms, P. D., Qin, X., & Yu, Y. (2025) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/00187267241251983 · Cited by 18
A. Jordan, K. (2021) · Journal of Mental Health and Social Behaviour · doi:10.33790/jmhsb1100148 · Cited by 3
Inheriting Versus Developing Data Analytic Tests and Auditors’ Professional Skepticism
LI, X., BRAZEL, J. F., GOLD, A., & LEIBY, J. (2026) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.70014 · Cited by 3
Behold the best and worst of me: the impostor phenomenon and academic behavior in the business area,
Meurer, A. M., & Costa, F. (2020) · Revista Contabilidade & Finanças · doi:10.1590/1808-057x201910370 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Management
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 601-617
- ISSN
- 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-1211
- OpenAlex
- W1983115028
- Cited by
- 6,250
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
