Cited by 21Mentoring and Academic DevelopmentJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorHealthcare Education and Workforce Issues

Identification and Development of Items Comprising Organizational Citizenship Behaviors Among Pharmacy Faculty

Open access
Desselle, Shane P., Semsick, Gretchen R.·2016·American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education

Abstract

Objective. Identify behaviors that can compose a measure of organizational citizenship by pharmacy faculty. Methods. A four-round, modified Delphi procedure using open-ended questions (Round 1) was conducted with 13 panelists from pharmacy academia. The items generated were evaluated and refined for inclusion in subsequent rounds. A consensus was reached after completing four rounds. Results. The panel produced a set of 26 items indicative of extra-role behaviors by faculty colleagues considered to compose a measure of citizenship, which is an expressed manifestation of collegiality. Conclusions. The items generated require testing for validation and reliability in a large sample to create a measure of organizational citizenship. Even prior to doing so, the list of items can serve as a resource for mentorship of junior and senior faculty alike.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5688/ajpe8010168

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [52]52. Shirk J, Miller M. Linking the faculty recognition process to teaching excellence. Paper presented at the National Conference on Successful College Teaching; February 1994; Orlando, FL. (ERIC No. ED390456).
  2. [61]61. Umphress EE, Tihanyi L, Bierman L, Gogus CI. Personal lives? The effect of nonwork behaviors on organizational image. Org Psychol Rev. 2013;3(3):199-221.
  3. [71]71. Morgan DL. Focus groups. Annu Rev Sociol. 1996;22:129-152.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Desselle, S. P., & Semsick, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Touro University California (US)
  • Kroger (United States) (US)
Venue
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-12
Volume
80
Issue
10
Pages
168
ISSN
0002-9459 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580217954
Cited by
21
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Touro Scholar (Touro College) (submittedVersion)
Funders
American Foundation for Pharmaceutical Education
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mentoring and Academic Development
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
Keywords
organizational citizenship behavior, pharmacy faculty, extra-role behavior, collegiality, scale development, Delphi consensus, faculty mentoring, pharmacy education
MeSH terms
Faculty, Pharmacy, Attitude of Health Personnel, Behavior, Delphi Technique, Education, Pharmacy, Schools, Pharmacy, Reproducibility of Results, Organizational Culture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review