Cited by 241Ethics and Social Impacts of AIInnovative Human-Technology InteractionInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

Values Levers: Building Ethics into Design

Shilton, Katie·2013·Science, Technology, & Human Values

Abstract

As information systems transform our world, computer scientists design affordances that influence the uses and impacts of these technological objects. This article describes how the practices of design affect the social values materialized in emerging technologies, and explores how design practices can encourage ethical reflection and action. The article presents an ethnography of a laboratory that engineered software for mobile phones to track users’ locations, habits, and behaviors. This technical work raised a number of ethical challenges, particularly around questions of data use and surveillance. The ethnography suggests that particular activities within laboratories can help engineers agree on social values as important to design. It characterizes these activities as values levers: practices that open new conversations about social values and encourage consensus around those values as design criteria. Laboratory leaders and advocates can enable and strengthen these levers to encourage ethical reflection and action as an explicit part of design practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0162243912436985

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many value-conscious design methods exist, including participatory design, reflective design, Values@Play, and Value-Sensitive Design, but thus far they have largely been implemented and studied in academic contexts which are more receptive to normative concerns than commercial settings.

    “Many such methods exist, 60 including participatory design, reflective design, Values@Play, and Value-Sensitive Design, 1 but thus far they have largely been implemented and studied in academic contexts which are more receptive to normative concerns than commercial settings.”

    From Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI (2019) · cites this paper as [61]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shilton, K.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Shilton, Katie
Venue
Science, Technology, & Human Values
Published
2012-04-23
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
374-397
ISSN
  • 0162-2439 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8251
OpenAlex
W2142013321
Cited by
240
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 5
FWCI
21.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Science Technology & Human Values (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
ethical design, design ethics, software ethics, location tracking, mobile phone data, surveillance, data utilization, engineering laboratories, consensus building, design criteria, information systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review