Cited by 1,650COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

A multinational, multicentre study on the psychological outcomes and associated physical symptoms amongst healthcare workers during COVID-19 outbreak

Open access
Chew, Nicholas W.S., Lee, Grace K.H., Tan, Benjamin Y.Q., Jing, Mingxue, Goh, Yihui, Ngiam, Nicholas J.H., Yeo, Leonard L.L., Ahmad, Aftab +21 more·2020·Brain, Behavior, and Immunity

Abstract

Objective Since the declaration of the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak as pandemic, there are reports on the increased prevalence of physical symptoms observed in the general population. We investigated the association between psychological outcomes and physical symptoms among healthcare workers.Methods Healthcare workers from 5 major hospitals, involved in the care for COVID-19 patients, in Singapore and India were invited to participate in a study by performing a self-administered questionnaire within the period of February 19 to April 17, 2020. Healthcare workers included doctors, nurses, allied healthcare workers, administrators, clerical staff and maintenance workers. This questionnaire collected information on demographics, medical history, symptom prevalence in the past month, Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R) instrument. The prevalence of physical symptoms displayed by healthcare workers and the associations between physical symptoms and psychological outcomes of depression, anxiety, stress, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) were evaluated.Results Out of the 906 healthcare workers who participated in the survey, 48 (5.3%) screened positive for moderate to very-severe depression, 79 (8.7%) for moderate to extremely-severe anxiety, 20 (2.2%) for moderate to extremely-severe stress, and 34 (3.8%) for moderate to severe levels of psychological distress. The commonest reported symptom was headache (32.3%), with a large number of participants (33.4%) reporting more than four symptoms. Participants who had experienced symptoms in the preceding month were more likely to be older, have pre-existing comorbidities and a positive screen for depression, anxiety, stress, and PTSD. After adjusting for age, gender and comorbidities, it was found that depression (OR 2.79, 95% CI 1.54-5.07, p = 0.001), anxiety (OR 2.18, 95% CI 1.36-3.48, p = 0.001), stress (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.27-7.41, p = 0.13), and PTSD (OR 2.20, 95% CI 1.12-4.35, p = 0.023) remained significantly associated with the presence of physical symptoms experienced in the preceding month. Linear regression revealed that the presence of physical symptoms was associated with higher mean scores in the IES-R, DASS Anxiety, Stress and Depression subscales.Conclusions Our study demonstrates a significant association between the prevalence of physical symptoms and psychological outcomes among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 outbreak. We postulate that this association may be bi-directional, and that timely psychological interventions for healthcare workers with physical symptoms should be considered once an infection has been excluded.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.04.049

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The included studies' findings indicate trauma-related stress in healthcare workers with a prevalence ranging from 7.4% to 35%.

    “Overall, the available findings highlight the presence of trauma-related stress, with a prevalence ranging from 7.4 to 35%, particularly among women, nurses, frontline workers, and in workers who experienced physical symptoms.”
  • Chew et al. (2020) found that 7.4% of the total sample of healthcare workers exceeded the IES-R cut-off, with 7.5% in Singapore and 7.3% in India.

    “The results of the study by Chew et al. (2020) were similar; 7.4% of the total sample of HCWs exceeded the IES-R cut-off (Singapore, 7.5%; India, 7.3).”
  • Chew et al. (2020) and Kang et al. (2020) associated having physical symptoms with an increased probability of high scores for trauma-related stress.

    “Like to the finding of Chew et al. (2020) and Kang et al. (2020) associated having physical symptoms with an increased probability of high scores for trauma-related stress.”
  • The included studies had higher percentages of females (64.3-82.7%) and nurses (up to 82.7%), with average ages ranging from 26 to 40 years.

    “All studies found higher percentages of females (64.3–82.7%) and nurses (up to 82.7%), with average ages ranging from 26 to 40 years (Chew et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2020; Lai et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020; Tan et al., 2020; Xiao et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).”
  • Risk factors for traumatic symptoms in healthcare workers include being female, younger, a frontline worker, a nurse, having less work experience, exposure to infected people, poor social support, difficult access to psychological material, insomnia, and physical symptoms.

    “Overall, the available findings highlight the presence of trauma-related stress, with a prevalence ranging from 7.4 to 35%, particularly among women, nurses, frontline workers, and in workers who experienced physical symptoms.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Matua G.A. Wal D.M. Living under the constant threat of Ebola: a phenomenological study of survivors and family caregivers during an ebola outbreak J. Nurs. Res. 23 3 2015 217 224 26270268

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chew, N. W. S., Lee, G. K. H., Tan, B. Y. Q., Jing, M., Goh, Y., Ngiam, N. J. H., Yeo, L. L. L., Ahmad, A., Ahmed Khan, F., Napolean Shanmugam, G., Sharma, A. K., Komalkumar, R. N., Meenakshi, P. V., Shah, K., Patel, B., Chan, B. P. L., Sunny, S., Chandra, B., Ong, J. J. Y., Paliwal, P. R., Wong, L. Y. H., Sagayanathan, R., Chen, J. T., Ying Ng, A. Y., Teoh, H. L., Tsivgoulis, G., Ho, C. S., Ho, R. C., & Sharma, V. K.
Affiliations
  • National University Health System (SG)
  • National University of Singapore (SG)
  • Ng Teng Fong General Hospital (SG)
  • Zydus Lifesciences Limited (India) (IN)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Sharma, Vijay K.
Venue
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
88
Pages
559-565
ISSN
0889-1591 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016592702
Cited by
1,650
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 140 · 2023: 250 · 2022: 364 · 2021: 532 · 2020: 277 · 2018: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
142.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Brain Behavior and Immunity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • National University of Singapore (submittedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, psychological distress, depression, anxiety, stress, post-traumatic stress disorder, somatic symptoms, headache, workplace mental health, Singapore, India, comorbidities, DASS-21, Impact of Event Scale-Revised, doctors and nurses
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adult, Allied Health Personnel, Anxiety, Depression, Female, Headache, Health Personnel, Humans, India, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Nurses, Pharyngitis, Physicians, Pneumonia, Viral, Surveys and Questionnaires, Singapore, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Stress, Psychological, Prevalence, Coronavirus Infections, Internationality, Lethargy, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review