Cited by 37Aging and Gerontology ResearchFrailty in Older AdultsHealth disparities and outcomes

Age-Related Changes in Biomarkers: Longitudinal Data from a Population-Based Sample

Open access
Glei, Dana A., Goldman, Noreen, Lin, Yu-Hsuan, Weinstein, Maxine·2011·Research on Aging

Abstract

Identifying how biological parameters change with age can provide insights into the physiological determinants of disease, and ultimately, death. Most prior studies of age-related change in biomarkers are based on cross-sectional data, small or selective samples, or a limited number of biomarkers. We use data from a nationally-representative longitudinal sample of 639 Taiwanese aged 54 and older in 2000 to assess changes over a six-year period in a wide range of biomarkers. Markers that increased most with age were glycoslyated hemoglobin, interleukin-6, and norepinephrine. Markers that decreased most with age were diastolic blood pressure and creatinine clearance. For example, glycoslyated hemoglobin increased by 8-13%, on average, over this six-year period. Several standard clinical risk factors exhibited little evidence of age-related change. Further research is needed to determine whether the observed variation between individuals in biomarker changes represents differences in underlying physiological function that are predictive of future health and survival.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0164027511399105

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Glei, D. A., Goldman, N., Lin, Y.-H., & Weinstein, M.
Affiliations
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • Department of Health (TW)
Corresponding author
Glei, Dana A.
Venue
Research on Aging
Published
2011-03-07
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
312-326
ISSN
  • 0164-0275 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-7573
OpenAlex
W2144205195
Cited by
37
References
41
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Research on Aging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG016790, R01AG016661)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R24HD047879)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
age-related changes, biomarkers, aging, HbA1c, interleukin-6, norepinephrine, diastolic blood pressure, creatinine clearance, older adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review