Cited by 44Child Nutrition and Water AccessEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentInfant Development and Preterm Care

Improving parenting practices and development for young children in Rwanda: Results from a randomized control trial

Abimpaye, Monique, Dusabe, Caroline, Nzabonimpa, Jean Providence, Ashford, Richard, Pisani, Lauren·2020·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

It is well known that the first 1,000 days of life have long-lasting impact on a child’s cognitive, language, socio-emotional, and physical development, but there is little evidence from Rwanda about how to maximize parent–child interactions during these critical early years. Save the Children piloted the First Steps “Intera za Mbere” early childhood parenting education program in one district of Rwanda to promote healthy development through holistic parenting education. Using a cluster randomized control trial, we assessed outcomes of a 17-week parenting education on parenting skills and child development for families with children aged 6–36 months. Families were randomly allocated into three study groups: light touch ( n = 482), full intervention ( n = 482), and control ( n = 483) groups. We used a Kinyarwanda-adaptation of the validated Ages & Stages Questionnaires (ASQ), a Home Observation Measurement of the Environment-Short Form. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were used for both the intention-to-treat analyses and more robust models controlling for ASQ form received, child gender, maternal education, number of children in the home, and baseline ASQ scores. Findings indicate that children in the light touch and full intervention groups were significantly more likely to meet the ASQ benchmarks than the control group in all developmental domains. The strong positive results from the light touch group are especially relevant to efforts to bring beneficial early childhood stimulation programs to scale in low-income contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0165025419861173

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Abimpaye, M., Dusabe, C., Nzabonimpa, J. P., Ashford, R., & Pisani, L.
Affiliations
  • Save the Children (BD)
  • Save the Children (US)
  • African Capacity Building Foundation (ZW)
  • Whitman College (US)
Corresponding author
Ashford, Richard
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2019-07-16
Volume
44
Issue
3
Pages
205-215
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W2959365558
Cited by
44
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
Funders
Grand Challenges Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
parent education, early childhood development, first 1000 days, parent-child interaction, early childhood stimulation, child development outcomes, low-income settings, Rwanda, program scaling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review