Cited by 408Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentSchool Choice and PerformanceYouth Development and Social Support

Adult outcomes as a function of an early childhood educational program: An Abecedarian Project follow-up.

Open access
Campbell, Frances A., Pungello, Elizabeth P., Burchinal, Margaret, Kainz, Kirsten, Pan, Yi, Wasik, Barbara H., Barbarin, Oscar A., Sparling, Joseph J. +1 more·2012·Developmental Psychology

Abstract

Adult (age 30) educational, economic, and social-emotional adjustment outcomes were investigated for participants in the Abecedarian Project, a randomized controlled trial of early childhood education for children from low-income families. Of the original 111 infants enrolled (98% African American), 101 took part in the age 30 follow-up. Primary indicators of educational level, economic status, and social adjustment were examined as a function of early childhood treatment. Treated individuals attained significantly more years of education, but income-to-needs ratios and criminal involvement did not vary significantly as a function of early treatment. A number of other indicators were described for each domain. Overall, the findings provide strong evidence for educational benefits, mixed evidence for economic benefits, and little evidence for treatment-related social adjustment outcomes. Implications for public policy are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0026644

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review identified few primary prevention studies which did not demonstrate impact, suggesting publication bias, which undermines the ability to assess unsuccessful interventions.

    “Finally, we identified few primary prevention studies which did not demonstrate impact25,34,36 suggesting publication bias, which undermines our ability to assess unsuccessful interventions.”

    From Community investment interventions as a means for decarceration: A scoping review (2022) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results (no page supplied) report no treatment difference in criminal activity, so this paper provides an example of a prevention study with a null outcome. But the Results also report significant educational gains, so it is not an example of an intervention that showed no impact overall. The paper does not assess the citing review’s study count or its suggestion of publication bias. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Abecedarian Project RCT found no significant difference between intervention and control groups in conviction or incarceration as late as 30 years from the intervention.

    “An RCT evaluating The Abecedarian Project, an intensive early childhood education targeting children considered at risk for academic failure found no significant difference between intervention and control groups in conviction or incarceration as late as 30 years from the intervention.25”
  • At 21, Abecedarian intervention participants had fewer depressive symptoms, less marijuana use, more physical activity, and better educational and vocational outcomes than controls.

    “At age 21, the intervention group had fewer symptoms of depression, lower marijuana use, a more active lifestyle, and significant educational and vocational benefits compared to the control group.(16, 17)”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ramey CT Campbell FA Mittler P Prevention of developmental retardation in high-risk children Research to Practice in Mental Retardation, Vol. 1 Care and Intervention 1977 By IASSMD 157 164
  2. Ramey CT Campbell FA Mittler P Educational intervention for children at risk for mild retardation: A longitudinal analysis Frontiers of Knowledge in Mental Retardation: Vol. 1, Social, Education, and Behavioral Aspects 1981 By IASSMD 47 57
  3. Reynolds AJ Temple JA Ou S-R White B Pungello E Impacts on socioeconomic status of the Child-Parent Center Preschool Program Breaking the poverty cycle: Economic indicators for adults who participated in three early childhood intervention programs 2009 4 Poster Symposium presented at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development Denver, CO (Chair)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Campbell, F. A., Pungello, E. P., Burchinal, M., Kainz, K., Pan, Y., Wasik, B. H., Barbarin, O. A., Sparling, J. J., & Ramey, C. T.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
Developmental Psychology
Published
2012-07
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
1033-1043
ISSN
  • 0012-1649 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0599
OpenAlex
W2107321230
Cited by
408
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 8
FWCI
125.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 HD040817)
  • Health Resources and Services Administration (6 R40 MC 00254)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Youth Development and Social Support
Keywords
Abecedarian Project, early childhood education, low-income households, African American children, educational attainment, economic status, income-to-needs ratio, criminal involvement, social adaptation, long-term outcomes, early intervention, public policy
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Educational Status, Family, Female, Health Status, Humans, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Poverty, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Social Adjustment, Socioeconomic Factors, Statistics as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Early Intervention, Educational, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review