Cited by 281Health disparities and outcomesAging and Gerontology ResearchAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Loneliness from young adulthood to old age: explaining age differences in loneliness

Open access
Hawkley, Louise C., Buecker, Susanne, Kaiser, Till, Luhmann, Maike·2022·International Journal of Behavioral Development

Abstract

Prior research in non-U.S. samples has found a complex nonlinear relationship between loneliness and age. This research has shown that established predictors of loneliness - poor health, being unmarried, living alone, and having infrequent social interactions - help to explain age differences in loneliness. However, while some variables were found to be universal predictors of loneliness at all ages, others were relevant in specific age groups only. In this study, we describe age differences in frequency of loneliness from age 18 to 89+ years in the U.S., and examine age differences in predictors of loneliness from age-specificity and age-normative perspectives. We used cross-sectional nationally representative data from the General Social Survey (N = 2,477) and found a nonlinear relationship between age and loneliness that closely resembles prior research. However, we found no evidence for age-specific predictors of loneliness. Household income, household size, marital status, health, and frequency of socializing were "universal" predictors of loneliness; their associations with loneliness did not differ in strength with age. Our hypothesis that individuals who deviated from age-specific norms would experience more intense loneliness was not supported. Implications for research and loneliness interventions are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0165025420971048

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Johnson DS, Smeeding TM, & Torrey BB (2005). Economic inequality through the prisms of income and consumption. Monthly Labor Review, 128, 11– 24.
  2. Smith TW, Davern M, Freese J, & Morgan SL (2019). General Social Surveys, 1972-2018 [machine-readable data file]. Sponsored by National Science Foundation. NORC edition. 1 data file (64,814 logical records) + 1 codebook (3,758 pp.). National Data Program for the Social Sciences, no. 25. Appendix A. Accessed Oct. 30, 2019. http://gss.norc.org/documents/codebook/GSS_Codebook_AppendixA.pdf.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hawkley, L. C., Buecker, S., Kaiser, T., & Luhmann, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Hawkley, Louise C.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Development
Published
2020-11-15
Volume
46
Issue
1
Pages
39-49
ISSN
  • 0165-0254 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0651
OpenAlex
W3106297590
Cited by
281
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 62 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 1
FWCI
12.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Grant LU 2053/2-1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
loneliness, age differences, life course, predictors of loneliness, marital status, living alone, social interaction, household income, household size, older adults, young adults

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review