The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Towards a Process Model of Corporate Greening
Abstract
Internal processes of corporate greening have received little scholarly attention. A two-study investigation of consumer-goods producers, implementing environmental management and subject to the 1991 German Packaging Ordinance offers new insights. Findings from Study 1, an exploratory factor analysis, suggest two independent dimensions of environmental management: Policy Commitment and Approach to Implementation. We expand traditional strategic change models, and generate a typology of four types of corporate greening: Deliberate Reactive, Unrealized, Emergent Active, and Deliberate Proactive greening. These are fleshed out with four known cases in Study 2. Alternative conceptual scenarios, developed to explain those types with inconsistent values for Policy Commitment and Implementation, point to new directions for research on the dynamics of internal processes of corporate greening. We conclude with implications for corporate social performance and strategic process models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1989.4279003 · Cited by 13,338
A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance
Carroll, A. B. (1979) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/257850 · Cited by 10,480
Strategic Responses to Institutional Processes
Oliver, C. (1991) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1991.4279002 · Cited by 8,950
Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments
Burgelman, R. A. (1994) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393493 · Cited by 1,018
Strategy implementation versus middle management self‐interest
Guth, W. D., & Macmillan, I. C. (1986) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250070403 · Cited by 671
Cited by
Information systems and ecological sustainability
Chen, A. J. W., Boudreau, M., & Watson, R. T. (2008) · Journal of Systems and Information Technology · doi:10.1108/13287260810916907 · Cited by 386
Teixeira, A. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., & Jabbour, A. B. L. D. S. (2012) · International Journal of Production Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.01.009 · Cited by 294
Re‐evaluating green marketing strategy: a stakeholder perspective
Rivera‐Camino, J. (2007) · European Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1108/03090560710821206 · Cited by 270
The place of waste: Changing business value for the circular economy
Perey, R., Benn, S., Agarwal, R., & Edwards, M. (2018) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.2068 · Cited by 199
Metadata
- Authors
- Winn, M. L., & Angell, L. C.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1119-1147
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2052044386
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Towards a Process Model of Corporate Greening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840600216005
- The paper
- Winn, M. L., & Angell, L. C. (2000). Towards a Process Model of Corporate Greening. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840600216005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.