Cited by 671Management and Organizational PracticesOrganizational Management and LeadershipManagement and Organizational Studies

Strategy implementation versus middle management self‐interest

Guth, William D., Macmillan, Ian C.·1986·Strategic Management Journal

Abstract

This paper focuses on middle management motivation to implement strategy. It uses expectancy theory to predict that middle managers will intervene in organizational decision‐making processes leading to strategy implementation when their self‐interest is at stake. It develops the notion of ‘counter effort’, as an extension of expectancy theory. The paper reports an empirical study of middle management intervention theory. The data and analysis of this study provide strong, if indirect, evidence that middle managers who believe that their self‐interest is being compromised can not only redirect a strategy, delay its implementation or reduce the quality of its implementation, but can also even totally sabotage the strategy. Implications of the study for the management of strategy implementation are developed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/smj.4250070403

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guth, W. D., & Macmillan, I. C.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
Venue
Strategic Management Journal
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-07
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
313-327
ISSN
  • 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0266
OpenAlex
W2085535361
Cited by
671
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 41 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 25
FWCI
29.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Strategic Management Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Management and Organizational Practices
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Organizational Management and Leadership
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Management and Organizational Studies
Keywords
strategy implementation, middle managers, self-interest, expectancy theory, organizational decision-making, managerial motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review