The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
`Two-Way Windows': Clinicians as Medical Managers
Abstract
This paper uses the metaphor of the `two-way window' to understand the aspirations and activities of clinical directors (doctors with management responsibilities). Clinical directors work simultaneously with sets of ideas from both clinical practice and from management, therefore, their role (as `two-way windows') allows the possibility to create a new area of expertise — medical-management. To explore how `two-way windows' are being constituted, clinician managers in three medical organizations were interviewed. Three narratives were constructed from their accounts. The first narrative outlines the theories-in-use of clinical directors, the second and third consist of the strategizing of clinical directors as they seek to maintain their primary focus on clinical work whilst, at the same time, developing their management expertise and influence. The paper concludes that clinical directors can relatively easily occupy the `two-way' space opened up by the mediation of medicine and management. Only a lack of financial management expertise renders their new organizational positioning vulnerable. All public bureaucracies now involve complex mediation between professionals and managers; hence, `two-way windows' will become increasingly significant in organizational development. These `two-way' roles privilege professional over managerial expertise as it is assumed that the appropriate professional training is of paramount importance. Unique professional/managerial discourses are being created in public-sector organizations. This paper provides a basis for understanding the development of such discourses.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Armstrong, J. S., & Georgoff, D. M. (1988) · International Journal of Forecasting · doi:10.1016/0169-2070(88)90019-2 · Cited by 17,894
The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge
Lyotard, J.-F., Bennington, G., & Massumi, B. (1984) · Poetics Today · doi:10.2307/1772278 · Cited by 14,728
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity
Rorty, R. (1989) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804397 · Cited by 6,740
The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception.
Loudon, J. B., Foucault, M., & Smith, A. M. S. (1974) · Man · doi:10.2307/2800095 · Cited by 3,466
Warren, N. (1973) · Social Science & Medicine (1967) · doi:10.1016/0037-7856(73)90053-x · Cited by 2,824
Paroutis, S. (2015) · Wiley Encyclopedia of Management · doi:10.1002/9781118785317.weom120194 · Cited by 2,792
Clegg, S. (1989) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446279267 · Cited by 2,330
Cited by
MCGIVERN, G., CURRIE, G., FERLIE, E., FITZGERALD, L., & WARING, J. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12119 · Cited by 411
UNDERSTANDING HYBRIDITY IN PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS
DENIS, J., FERLIE, E., & VAN GESTEL, N. (2015) · Public Administration · doi:10.1111/padm.12175 · Cited by 349
Llewellyn, S., Procter, R., Harvey, G., Maniatopoulos, G., & Boyd, A. (2014) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr02230 · Cited by 43
Self-citationKise Hjertstrøm, H., Obstfelder, A., & Norbye, B. (2018) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare6040128 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Llewellyn, S.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 593-623
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W1990179969
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 10.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: `Two-Way Windows': Clinicians as Medical Managers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0170840601224003
- The paper
- Llewellyn, S. (2001). `Two-Way Windows': Clinicians as Medical Managers. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840601224003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.