The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks
Abstract
Over the last decade, the field of organization studies has been characterized by a proliferation of divergent perspectives. Using bibliometric techniques, this paper examines the extent to which this state of differentiation may be associ ated with regional differences in scholarly orientation, specifically, between North America and Europe. The study is based on citation and co-citation analyses of articles published by North American authors in Administrative Science Quarterly and by European authors in Organization Studies in the three-year period from 1990 to 1992. Results do show that there is divergence in the perspectives that are currently dominant in Europe and North America, and, to some degree between Britain and elsewhere in Europe. The discussion section elaborates on the nature of the differences in orientation and speculates on factors that may have fostered and helped to maintain this diver gence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization
Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114562629 · Cited by 7,495
Ramos‐Rodríguez, A., & Ruíz‐Navarro, J. (2004) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.397 · Cited by 1,626
Resource Dependence Theory – How Well Does It Explain Behavior of Organizations?
Nienhüser, W. (2008) · management revu · doi:10.5771/0935-9915-2008-1-2-9 · Cited by 235
Is production and operations management a discipline? A citation/co‐citation study
Pilkington, A., & Liston‐Heyes, C. (1999) · International Journal of Operations & Production Management · doi:10.1108/01443579910244188 · Cited by 188
Carney, J., & Carron, P. M. (2017) · Journal of Cognition and Culture · doi:10.1163/15685373-12340009 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Üsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 503-526
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2005669495
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/017084069501600306
- The paper
- Üsdiken, B., & Pasadeos, Y. (1995). Organizational Analysis in North America and Europe: A Comparison of Co-citation Networks. Organization Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069501600306
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.