The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trust, Opportunism and Governance: A Process and Control Model
Abstract
In this paper a process and control model is developed for the analysis and design of inter-firm relations, in which both opportunism and trust play a role. Its aim is to develop a tool for the analysis, diagnosis and design of inter-firm partnerships. It takes into account the value of the partner, relative to alternat ives, and the risk of the relation. Risk depends on the incentives that the partner may have towards opportunism, his opportunities for opportunism and his 'pro pensity' towards opportunism. The latter is related to trust. A partner's incent ives towards opportunism depend on the uniqueness of the value that he offers, on one's own switching costs and on the partner's dependence on the relation. The underlying theory employs both transaction cost economics and social exchange theory. On the basis of the model, values and risks can be balanced in different ways: there are adversarial strategies that jeopardize value, and cooperative strategies that build value. The model can be used to explore viable sequences of strategies of governance, depending on different conditions. As an illustration, it is used for an analysis of ways to initiate a relation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Developing buyer-seller relationships
Dwyer, F. R., Schurr, P. H., & Oh, S. (1987) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1177/002224298705100202 · Cited by 9,139
Jarillo, J. C. (1988) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.4250090104 · Cited by 2,555
Bagozzi, R. P. (1975) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1250593 · Cited by 1,648
Cited by
Agency and Trust Mechanisms in Consumer Satisfaction and Loyalty Judgments
Singh, J., & Sirdeshmukh, D. (2000) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1177/0092070300281014 · Cited by 1,635
Pavlou, P. A., & Dimoka, A. (2006) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.1060.0106 · Cited by 930
Institutions and Forms of Co-ordination in Innovation Systems
Nooteboom, B. (2000) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840600215004 · Cited by 235
Self-citationCross-buying in retailing: Drivers and consequences
KUMAR, V, GEORGE, M., & PANCRAS, J. (2008) · Journal of Retailing · doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.007 · Cited by 184
Managing HR in the Small and Medium Enterprise: The Impact of Professional Employer Organizations
Klaas, B. S., Mcclendon, J., & Gainey, T. W. (2000) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1177/104225870002500109 · Cited by 77
The effects of culture and structure on strategic flexibility during business model innovation
Bock, A. J., Opsahl, T., George, G., & Gann, D. M. (2012) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2011.01030.x · Cited by 78
Transaction Costs and Outsourcing Decisions in Small- and Medium-Sized Family Firms
Memili, E., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2011) · Family Business Review · doi:10.1177/0894486510396706 · Cited by 51
Trust, Decision Rights Delegation, and Performance—The Case of Franchising
Herz, M., Hutzinger, C., Seferagic, H., & Windsperger, J. (2016) · Journal of Small Business Management · doi:10.1111/jsbm.12227 · Cited by 35
The evolution of OSS governance: a dimensional comparative analysis
De Noni, I., Ganzaroli, A., & Orsi, L. (2013) · Scandinavian Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2012.10.003 · Cited by 31
Interpretive structural modelling of inter-agency collaboration risk in public safety networks
Sienkiewicz-Małyjurek, K. (2022) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-021-01172-0 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Nooteboom, B.
- Venue
- Organization Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-11
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 985-1010
- ISSN
- 0170-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3044
- OpenAlex
- W2097927444
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 21.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.