Cited by 12

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Childhood Risky Family Environments and Romantic Relationship Functioning Among Young Adult Dating Couples

Maleck, Sarah, Papp, Lauren M.·2015·Journal of Family Issues

Abstract

This study evaluated associations between dating partners’ risky family backgrounds in childhood and current romantic relationship functioning. One hundred young adult dating couples ( N = 200) self-reported childhood risky family environments (e.g., conflict, nonnurturing behavior, neglect) and current relationship satisfaction. Partners also engaged in laboratory-based conflict, which was subsequently coded for positive and negative interaction qualities. Results revealed a positive linkage between males’ and females’ risky family backgrounds. Actor–Partner Interdependence Modeling, which accommodated dyadic data and controlled for neuroticism levels, indicated that males’ riskier family backgrounds were associated with their female partners’ greater observed negative interaction qualities (e.g., conflict) and with their partners’ lower observed positive interaction (e.g., support, communication skills). Experiencing interparental divorce during childhood moderated the results, with riskier family backgrounds holding more negative implications for subsequent young adult romantic relationships when the parents remained together during childhood compared to when the parents divorced.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0192513x13491749

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 45

  1. 10.1037/0033-2909.110.1.26 · DOI
  2. 10.2307/2580551 · DOI
  3. Arbuckle J. L., 2011, Amos
  4. 10.1080/019261899261943 · DOI
  5. Byrne B. M., 2001, Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming
  6. 10.2307/1131401 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/01650250444000405 · DOI
  8. 10.2307/353564 · DOI
  9. 10.1177/0265407506068262 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/1132075 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/a0012506 · DOI
  12. 10.1177/0265407509347932 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1177/0265407503206006 · DOI
  14. 10.1037/0022-006X.69.1.13 · DOI
  15. 10.1002/da.20592 · DOI
  16. 10.1037/0893-164X.22.3.313 · DOI
  17. 10.1007/s10591-007-9039-x · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0265407511426939 · DOI
  19. Gottman J. M., 1994, What predicts divorce?
  20. 10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2005.00010.x · DOI
  22. 10.1080/10926771.2010.502068 · DOI
  23. 10.1037/a0019879 · DOI
  24. 10.1037/1040-3590.13.1.5 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.87 · DOI
  26. Julien D., 1989, Behavioral Assessment, 11, 81
  27. Kashy D. A., 2000, Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology, 451
  28. Kenny D. A., 2006, Dyadic data analysis
  29. Kline G. H., 2004, Couple observational coding systems, 113
  30. 10.1037/0022-3514.46.1.112 · DOI
  31. 10.1097/PSY.0b013e318228c820 · DOI
  32. 10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.79 · DOI
  33. 10.1001/archpsyc.1982.04290100043007 · DOI
  34. 10.1080/15374410902976270 · DOI
  35. 10.1007/s10896-010-9319-3 · DOI
  36. 10.1037/a0018662 · DOI
  37. 10.1177/0265407509348810 · DOI
  38. 10.1037//0033-2909.128.2.230 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1093/oso/9780195169157.003.0008 · DOI
  40. 10.1037/a0019711 · DOI
  41. 10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.295 · DOI
  42. 10.1111/j.1471-6402.2008.01468.x · DOI
  43. 10.1300/J087v47n01_02 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.paid.2004.02.019 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.psychres.2005.07.019 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 12

Metadata

Authors
Maleck, S., & Papp, L. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, WI, USA
  • University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI, USA
Venue
Journal of Family Issues
Published
2013-06-20
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
567-588
ISSN
  • 0192-513X
  • 1552-5481
Cited by
12
References
8
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review