Cited by 39Crime Patterns and InterventionsPolicing Practices and PerceptionsEvaluation and Performance Assessment

The Problem Is Not Just Sample Size: The Consequences of Low Base Rates in Policing Experiments in Smaller Cities

Hinkle, Joshua C., Weisburd, David, Famega, Christine, Ready, Justin·2013·Evaluation Review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hot spots policing is one of the most influential police innovations, with a strong body of experimental research showing it to be effective in reducing crime and disorder. However, most studies have been conducted in major cities, and we thus know little about whether it is effective in smaller cities, which account for a majority of police agencies. The lack of experimental studies in smaller cities is likely in part due to challenges designing statistically powerful tests in such contexts. OBJECTIVES: The current article explores the challenges of statistical power and "noise" resulting from low base rates of crime in smaller cities and provides suggestions for future evaluations to overcome these limitations. RESEARCH DESIGN: Data from a randomized experimental evaluation of broken windows policing in hot spots are used to illustrate the challenges that low base rates present for evaluating hot spots policing programs in smaller cities. RESULTS: Analyses show low base rates make it difficult to detect treatment effects. Very large effect sizes would be required to reach sufficient power, and random fluctuations around low base rates make detecting treatment effects difficult, irrespective of power, by masking differences between treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low base rates present strong challenges to researchers attempting to evaluate hot spots policing in smaller cities. As such, base rates must be taken directly into account when designing expe…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193841x13519799

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Statistical powerlessness is often more prevalent in place-based policing (quasi-)experiments conducted in small and medium-sized cities, where low crime base rates make it challenging to isolate intervention effects and fluctuations in crime rates can hinder detection of significant treatment effects.

    “In addition, it is argued that the issue of statistical powerlessness is often more prevalent in place-based policing (quasi-)experiments conducted in small and medium-sized cities, where low crime base rates make it challenging to isolate the effects of interventions, and fluctuations in crime rates can hinder the detection of significant treatment effects (Ariel et al., 2021;Hinkle et al., 2013;”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hinkle, J. C., Weisburd, D., Famega, C., & Ready, J.
Affiliations
  • Georgia State University (US)
  • George Mason University (US)
  • California State University, San Bernardino (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Hinkle, Joshua C.
Venue
Evaluation Review
Published
2013-06
Volume
37
Issue
3-4
Pages
213-238
ISSN
  • 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
  • 0193-841X
  • 1552-3926
OpenAlex
W2027890644
Cited by
39
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Keywords
hot spot policing, broken windows policing, statistical power, small towns, crime prevention evaluation, randomized experiments, treatment effect detection, sample size
MeSH terms
Cities, Crime, Criminal Law, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Police, Sample Size

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review