The Problem Is Not Just Sample Size: The Consequences of Low Base Rates in Policing Experiments in Smaller Cities
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hot spots policing is one of the most influential police innovations, with a strong body of experimental research showing it to be effective in reducing crime and disorder. However, most studies have been conducted in major cities, and we thus know little about whether it is effective in smaller cities, which account for a majority of police agencies. The lack of experimental studies in smaller cities is likely in part due to challenges designing statistically powerful tests in such contexts. OBJECTIVES: The current article explores the challenges of statistical power and "noise" resulting from low base rates of crime in smaller cities and provides suggestions for future evaluations to overcome these limitations. RESEARCH DESIGN: Data from a randomized experimental evaluation of broken windows policing in hot spots are used to illustrate the challenges that low base rates present for evaluating hot spots policing programs in smaller cities. RESULTS: Analyses show low base rates make it difficult to detect treatment effects. Very large effect sizes would be required to reach sufficient power, and random fluctuations around low base rates make detecting treatment effects difficult, irrespective of power, by masking differences between treatment and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Low base rates present strong challenges to researchers attempting to evaluate hot spots policing in smaller cities. As such, base rates must be taken directly into account when designing expe…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Statistical powerlessness is often more prevalent in place-based policing (quasi-)experiments conducted in small and medium-sized cities, where low crime base rates make it challenging to isolate intervention effects and fluctuations in crime rates can hinder detection of significant treatment effects.
“In addition, it is argued that the issue of statistical powerlessness is often more prevalent in place-based policing (quasi-)experiments conducted in small and medium-sized cities, where low crime base rates make it challenging to isolate the effects of interventions, and fluctuations in crime rates can hinder the detection of significant treatment effects (Ariel et al., 2021;Hinkle et al., 2013;”
From ‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing (2024) · cites this paper as Hinkle et al., 2013
Cites
HOT SPOTS OF PREDATORY CRIME: ROUTINE ACTIVITIES AND THE CRIMINOLOGY OF PLACE*
SHERMAN, L. W., GARTIN, P. R., & BUERGER, M. E. (1989) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1989.tb00862.x · Cited by 2,104 · see citing works
General deterrent effects of police patrol in crime “hot spots”: A randomized, controlled trial
Sherman, L. W., & Weisburd, D. (1995) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418829500096221 · Cited by 1,029 · see citing works
Self-citationPROBLEM‐ORIENTED POLICING IN VIOLENT CRIME PLACES: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT*
BRAGA, A. A., WEISBURD, D. L., WARING, E. J., MAZEROLLE, L. G., SPELMAN, W., & GAJEWSKI, F. (1999) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1999.tb00496.x · Cited by 583 · see citing works
Self-citationWEISBURD, D., WYCKOFF, L. A., READY, J., ECK, J. E., HINKLE, J. C., & GAJEWSKI, F. (2006) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.2006.00057.x · Cited by 533 · see citing works
Self-citationSherman, L. W. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11292-007-9044-y · Cited by 183 · see citing works
When can we Conclude that Treatments or Programs “Don’t Work”?
Weisburd, D., Lum, C. M., & Yang, S.-M. (2003) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716202250782 · Cited by 76 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This is a crucial concern, as studies that lack sufficient power may lead the evaluators to erroneously conclude that a treatment did not work, when in fact the research design simply lacked the power to tell whether or not the program had an impact (see Weisburd, Lum, and Yang 2003).”
BackgroundSelf-citationRisk‐Focused Policing at Places: An Experimental Evaluation
Weisburd, D., Morris, N. A., & Ready, J. (2008) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418820801954647 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Impact of Hot Spots Policing on Collective Efficacy: Findings from a Randomized Field Trial
Rinehart Kochel, T., & Weisburd, D. (2019) · Justice Quarterly · doi:10.1080/07418825.2018.1465579 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
“…policing studies, and they hypothesize that this might have impacted their ability to observe impacts upon crime and community outcomes (see also Hinkle, Weisburd, Famega, & Ready, 2013) Hot spots policing focused on higher crime settings like those we examine might lead to stronger community…”
Self-citationTaylor, R. B., & Ratcliffe, J. H. (2020) · Criminology & Public Policy · doi:10.1111/1745-9133.12514 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
‘Led by Intelligence': A Scoping Review on the Experimental Evaluation of Intelligence-Led Policing
Khalfa, R., & Hardyns, W. (2024) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x231204588 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hinkle, J. C., Weisburd, D., Famega, C., & Ready, J.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- George Mason University (US)
- California State University, San Bernardino (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hinkle, Joshua C.
- Venue
- Evaluation Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-06
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 3-4
- Pages
- 213-238
- ISSN
- 0145-4692 (ISSN-L)
- 0193-841X
- 1552-3926
- OpenAlex
- W2027890644
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Evaluation Review (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Policing Practices and Perceptions
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Evaluation and Performance Assessment
- Keywords
- hot spot policing, broken windows policing, statistical power, small towns, crime prevention evaluation, randomized experiments, treatment effect detection, sample size
- MeSH terms
- Cities, Crime, Criminal Law, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Humans, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Police, Sample Size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review