Cited by 69Palliative Care and End-of-Life IssuesEthics in medical practiceFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units

Evaluation of the Decisional Fatigue Scale Among Surrogate Decision Makers of the Critically Ill

Open access
Hickman, Ronald L., Pignatiello, Grant A., Tahir, Sadia·2018·Western Journal of Nursing Research

Abstract

Intense emotional distress and impaired information processing have been implicated in reducing a surrogate decision maker’s ability to formulate informed health care decisions for a critically ill patient. The heightened intensity of negative emotions, mental effort, and impaired judgment is consistent with the manifestation of decision fatigue. The aim of this article is to describe the validity and reliability of the Decision Fatigue Scale (DFS) among surrogate decision makers of the critically ill. A convenience sample of 101 surrogate decision makers were administered the DFS and a battery of psychosocial instruments at two time points. The DFS was specified as a unidimensional measure with adequate internal consistency (Cronbach’s αs = .87, .90) and stability reliability. Discriminant validity was established with measures of emotion regulation, anxiety, and depressive symptoms. The DFS is the first subjective measure of decision fatigue for surrogate decision makers of the critically ill that demonstrates satisfactory psychometric properties.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0193945917723828

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decision fatigue was measured using the 9-item DFS developed by Hickman et al. and translated and validated in Chinese by Pan Guocui et al.; in this study Cronbach's α = 0.912.

    “Decision fatigue was measured using the 9-item DFS developed by Hickman et al.22 and translated and validated in Chinese by Pan Guocui et al.23 for ICU family caregivers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Nunnally JC Bernstein IH 1978 Psychometric testing New York, NY McGraw-Hill
  2. Zaiţ A Bertea P 2011 Methods for testing discriminant validity Management & Marketing Journal 9 2 217 224

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hickman, R. L., Pignatiello, G. A., & Tahir, S.
Affiliations
Case Western Reserve University (US)
Corresponding author
Hickman, Ronald L.
Venue
Western Journal of Nursing Research
Published
2017-08-14
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
191-208
ISSN
  • 0193-9459 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-8456
OpenAlex
W2746216906
Cited by
69
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Western Journal of Nursing Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Nursing Research (T32NR015433, T32NR014213, R01NR015750)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Radiological and Ultrasound Technology › Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Keywords
decision fatigue, surrogate decision makers, critically ill patients, psychometric validation, reliability statistics, validity, emotion regulation, anxiety, depressive symptoms, family caregivers
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Decision Making, Fatigue, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Ohio, Psychometrics, Stress, Psychological, Reproducibility of Results, Critical Illness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review