The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe
Abstract
This paper examines the neoliberal ideals that underpin participation and citizenship in the smart city and their replication mechanisms at the European level, particularly focusing on the work of the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities. The research consisted of three levels of data generation and analysis: a discourse analysis of policy documents and project descriptions of the 61 Commitments in the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities ‘citizen-focus’ cluster; interviews with a dozen stakeholders working on citizen engagement in a small sample of European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities flagship projects; and twenty interviews with city officers and corporate exhibitors at the 2017 Smart City Expo and World Congress. We contend that smart cities as currently conceived enact a blueprint of neoliberal urbanism and promote a form of neoliberal citizenship. Supra-national institutions like the European Innovation Partnership for Smart Cities and Communities act at a multi-scalar level, connecting diverse forms of neoliberal urbanism whilst promoting policy agendas and projects that perform neoliberal citizenship in the spaces of the everyday. Despite attempts to recast the smart city as ‘citizen-focused’, smart urbanism remains rooted in pragmatic, instrumental and paternalistic discourses and practices rather than those of social rights, political citizenship, and the common good. In our view, if smart cities are to become truly ‘citizen-focused’, an alternative conception of smart citizenship needs to be deployed, one that enables an effective shift of power and is rooted in the right to the city, entitlements, community, participation, commons, and ideals beyond the market.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Ladder Of Citizen Participation
Arnstein, S. R. (1969) · Journal of the American Institute of Planners · doi:10.1080/01944366908977225 · Cited by 17,064
Hamilton, H., & Marshall, T. H. (1951) · The British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/587460 · Cited by 4,094
Will the real smart city please stand up?: Intelligent, progressive or entrepreneurial?
Hollands, R. G. (2008) · City · doi:10.1080/13604810802479126 · Cited by 3,025
Cities and the Geographies of “Actually Existing Neoliberalism”
Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002) · Antipode · doi:10.1111/1467-8330.00246 · Cited by 2,868
The real-time city? Big data and smart urbanism
Kitchin, R. (2014) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1007/s10708-013-9516-8 · Cited by 2,794
Self-citationVariegated neoliberalization: geographies, modalities, pathways
BRENNER, N., PECK, J., & THEODORE, N. (2010) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0374.2009.00277.x · Cited by 1,809
Towards a new epistemology of the urban?
Brenner, N., & Schmid, C. (2015) · City · doi:10.1080/13604813.2015.1014712 · Cited by 1,532
Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy
Vanolo, A. (2014) · Urban Studies · doi:10.1177/0042098013494427 · Cited by 1,391
Excavating Lefebvre: The right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant
Purcell, M. (2002) · GeoJournal · doi:10.1023/b:gejo.0000010829.62237.8f · Cited by 1,112
Code/Space: Software and Everyday Life
Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/9780262042482.001.0001 · Cited by 964
Self-citation
Cited by
Kummitha, R. K. R. (2020) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101481 · Cited by 268
Bina, O., Inch, A., & Pereira, L. (2020) · Futures · doi:10.1016/j.futures.2019.102475 · Cited by 144
Smart city trends: A focus on 5 countries and 15 companies
Kim, J. (2022) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2021.103551 · Cited by 126
Törnberg, P. (2025) · Social Media + Society · doi:10.1177/20563051251323389 · Cited by 14
“First, the literatures on “platform urbanism” (Barns, 2019; Leszczynski, 2020; van Doorn, 2020), and “smart urbanism” (Cardullo & Kitchin, 2019; Kitchin, 2014) tend to take a critical position, viewing the mediation of urbanity as part of the workings of a mode of capitalism “centred upon…”
Cautious hope: prospects and perils of communitarian governance in a Web3 environment
Ettlinger, N. (2024) · Digital Geography and Society · doi:10.1016/j.diggeo.2024.100080 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R.
- Venue
- Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-10-25
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 813-830
- ISSN
- 2399-6544 (ISSN-L)
- 2399-6552
- OpenAlex
- W2898511333
- Cited by
- 438
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 24.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0263774x18806508
- The paper
- Cardullo, P., & Kitchin, R. (2019). Smart urbanism and smart citizenship: The neoliberal logic of ‘citizen-focused’ smart cities in Europe. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774x18806508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.