Cited by 42Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceFamily Dynamics and RelationshipsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Marital violence and coparenting quality after separation.

Open access
Hardesty, Jennifer L., Crossman, Kimberly A., Khaw, Lyndal, Raffaelli, Marcela·2016·Journal of Family Psychology

Abstract

Research has identified multiple predictors of coparenting quality, but few studies have investigated how intimate partner violence (IPV) affects divorcing couples' coparenting relationships. We addressed this question in a sample of 154 mothers with different marital IPV experiences. Mothers were recruited within 4 months of a divorce filing and completed two interviews 3 months apart. At Time 1, mothers reported on violence and coercive control during marriage, and postseparation behavioral (e.g., parental communication), emotional (e.g., anger), and intrusion (e.g., harassment) dynamics; at Time 2, they reported on coparenting quality (i.e., levels of support and conflict). In the overall sample, divorce and violence variables independently predicted coparenting quality. Mothers were then classified into three groups: no violence (NV; n = 74), situational couple violence (SCV; n = 46), or coercive controlling violence (CCV; n = 34). Of the 3, coparenting quality was lowest in the CCV group. While the SCV group was similar to the NV group on most divorce-related variables, the CCV group reported more hostility at separation and placed less importance on father-child relationships. Finally, patterns of association between study variables and coparenting quality showed some parallels between the SCV and NV groups. For CCV, postseparation harassment and fear were negatively associated with coparenting quality. Findings contribute to understanding predictors of coparenting quality and support the need for individualized assessments of divorce cases with attention to IPV dynamics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/fam0000132

Cites

23 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All seven longitudinal articles highlighted a need to intervene early when IPV is present to lessen the likelihood of more severe forms of violence occurring.

    “All seven of the articles highlighted a need to intervene early when IPV is present to lessen the likelihood of more severe forms of violence occurring (Hardesty et al., 2016;Kuijpers et al., 2012;Lohman et al., 2013;Panuzio & DiLillo, 2010;Stylianou et al., 2013;Sunday et al., 2011;Wyatt et al., 2000).”

    From The relationship between emotional intimate partner violence and other forms of violence: A metaanalytic review. (2024) · cites this paper as Hardesty et al., 2016

    The Discussion (page unavailable in our copy) calls for individualized assessments of IPV and postseparation risks, and describes the study as examining mothers early in the divorce process. It does not say that early intervention makes more severe forms of violence less likely. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Five studies found that conflict or IPV identified early on in relationships was related to revictimization or escalating violence.

    “Five studies found that conflict or IPV identified early on in relationships was related to revictimization or escalating violence (Hardesty et al., 2016;Kuijpers et al., 2012;Panuzio & DiLillo, 2010;Stylianou et al., 2013;Wyatt et al., 2000).”

    From The relationship between emotional intimate partner violence and other forms of violence: A metaanalytic review. (2024) · cites this paper as Hardesty et al., 2016

    The Discussion section reports that controlling dynamics during marriage appeared to persist after separation, with harassment and fear among mothers in the coercive controlling violence group. This supports a link between earlier IPV and later harmful behavior, but the study does not establish that conflict or IPV identified early in a relationship predicted revictimization or escalating violence. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Maccoby EE Mnookin RH 1998 Dividing the child: Social and legal dilemmas of custody Cambridge, MA Harvard University Press
  2. Macie KM Stolberg AL 2003 Assessing parenting after divorce: The Co-Parenting Behavior Questionnaire Journal of Divorce and Remarriage 39 1–2 89 107 10.1300/J087v39n01_06 · DOI
  3. Madden-Derdich DA Arditti JA 1999 The ties that bind: Attachment between former spouses Family Relations 48 3 243 249 10.2307/585633 · DOI
  4. Markham MS Ganong LH Coleman M 2007 Coparental identity and mothers’ cooperation in coparental relationships Family Relations 56 4 369 377 10.1111/j.1741-3729.2007.00466.x · DOI
  5. Masheter C 1997 Healthy and unhealthy friendship and hostility between ex-spouses Journal of Marriage and the Family 59 463 475 10.2307/353483 · DOI
  6. Sheridan DJ 2001 Treating survivors of intimate partner abuse Olshaker JS Jackson MC Smock WS Forensic emergency medicine 203 228 Philadelphia, PA Lippincott Williams & Wilkens
  7. Tolman RM 1992 Psychological abuse of women Ammerman RT Hersen M Assessment of family violence: A clinical and legal sourcebook 291 310 New York, NY Wiley
  8. Ver Steegh N 2004 Differentiating types of domestic violence: Implications for child custody Louisiana Law Review 65 4 1379 1431

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hardesty, J. L., Crossman, K. A., Khaw, L., & Raffaelli, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
  • Montclair State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Family Psychology
Published
2016-04
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
320-330
ISSN
  • 0893-3200 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1293
OpenAlex
W2317742345
Cited by
42
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Family Psychology (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R21HD061559A)
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • United States Department of Agriculture (793-348)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
intimate partner violence, coparenting quality, divorce, marital separation, situational couple violence, parental conflict, father-child relationship, mothers
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Divorce, Female, Humans, Infant, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Mothers, Spouse Abuse, Parenting, Qualitative Research, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review