The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement
Abstract
This multi-methodological study examined the news framing of the 2004 European Union enlargement in terms of risk and opportunity and the effect both frames had on public support for the enlargement. A content analysis showed that EU enlargement was portrayed as a controversial issue, but with an overall balanced tone of coverage. Risk and opportunity framing played an equally prominent role in the news. An experiment examined the impact of both frames on support for EU enlargement. Participants in the opportunity frame condition showed significantly higher levels of support compared to participants in the risk condition. This framing effect was moderated by political knowledge. Individuals with low levels of political knowledge were more affected by the news frames and more susceptible to risk framing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 18,497
Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm
Entman, R. M. (1993) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x · Cited by 16,203
All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2804 · Cited by 2,592
Levin, I. P., & Gaeth, G. J. (1988) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209174 · Cited by 1,172
Cited by
Absent yet popular? Explaining news visibility of Members of the European Parliament
Gattermann, K., & Vasilopoulou, S. (2015) · European Journal of Political Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6765.12071 · Cited by 52
Video Killed the News Article? Comparing Multimodal Framing Effects in News Videos and Articles
Powell, T. E., Boomgaarden, H. G., De Swert, K., & de Vreese, C. H. (2018) · Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · doi:10.1080/08838151.2018.1483935 · Cited by 46
Rice, R. E., Gustafson, A., & Hoffman, Z. (2018) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2018.1430046 · Cited by 39
Metadata
- Authors
- Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Communication
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-32
- ISSN
- 0267-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-3705
- OpenAlex
- W2031631664
- Cited by
- 303
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 56.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0267323106060987
- The paper
- Schuck, A. R. T., & de Vreese, C. H. (2006). Between Risk and Opportunity: News Framing and its Effects on Public Support for EU Enlargement. European Journal of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267323106060987
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
