Cited by 88Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyNutrition and Health in AgingDysphagia Assessment and Management

Oral nutritional support of older (65 years+) medical and surgical patients after discharge from hospital: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Beck, Anne Marie, Holst, Mette, Rasmussen, Henrik Højgaard·2013·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

Objective To estimate the effectiveness of oral nutritional support compared to placebo or usual care in improving clinical outcome in older (65 years+) medical and surgical patients after discharge from hospital. Outcome goals were: re-admissions, survival, nutritional and functional status, quality of life and morbidity. Data sources Three recent Cochrane reviews and an update of their literature search using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science. Search terms included randomized controlled trials; humans; age 65+ years; subset: dietary supplements. Review methods One reviewer assessed trials for inclusion, extracted data and assessed trial quality. Results Six trials were included (N = 716 randomly assigned participants). All trials used oral nutritional supplements. A positive effect on nutritional intake (energy) and/or nutritional status (weight) (in compliant participants) were observed in all trials. Two pooled analysis was based on a fixed-effects model. No significant effect were found on mortality (four randomized controlled trials with 532 participants, odds ratio 0.80 (95% confidence (CI) interval 0.46 to 1.39)) or re-admissions (four randomized controlled trials with 478 participants, odds ratio 1.07 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.61)). Conclusion Although the evidence is limited, we suggest that oral nutritional support may be considered for older malnourished medical and surgical patients after discharge from hospital.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215512445396

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Systematic reviews found evidence for improved body weight and nutritional status in older patients after discharge either with individualized nutritional support or intervention with ONS.

    “Systematic reviews found evidence for improved body weight and nutritional status in older patients after discharge either with individualized nutritional support [113] or intervention with ONS [114].”
  • One systematic literature review focusing on the time after hospital discharge included six trials and found evidence for increased dietary intake and body weight with ONS, but not concerning mortality or readmission risk.

    “One SLR focusing on the time following hospital discharge (116) included six trials and found evidence for increased dietary intake and BW with ONS, but not concerning mortality or readmission risk.”
  • Positive effects of ONS on dietary intake and body weight, and reduced risk of complications and readmissions were reported, whereas length of hospital stay and mortality risk were not significantly reduced.

    “Altogether, positive effects of ONS on dietary intake (115, 116, 119, 121) and BW (115, 116, 119, 121), and reduced risk of complications (121) and readmissions (115, 120, 121) were reported, whereas the length of hospital stay (114, 115, 121) and mortality risk (114-116, 119, 121) were not significantly reduced.”
  • A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons.

    “A systematic literature search found six high-quality SLRs that have assessed the efficacy of ONS versus usual care in older persons (114-121).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, A. M., Holst, M., & Rasmussen, H. H.
Affiliations
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • Aalborg University Hospital (DK)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2012-05-29
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
19-27
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2109730196
Cited by
88
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10
FWCI
0.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Dysphagia Assessment and Management
Keywords
oral nutritional support, older adults, post-discharge care, malnutrition, dietary supplements, hospital readmission, mortality, nutritional status, weight gain, quality of life, functional status, medical patients, surgical patients
MeSH terms
Aged, Enteral Nutrition, Humans, Patient Discharge, Surgical Procedures, Operative, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nutritional Support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review