Cited by 103Tendon Structure and TreatmentShoulder Injury and TreatmentMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

A randomized controlled trial of eccentric vs. concentric graded exercise in chronic tennis elbow (lateral elbow tendinopathy)

Peterson, Magnus, Butler, Stephen, Eriksson, Margaretha, Svärdsudd, Kurt·2014·Clinical Rehabilitation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse treatment effects of eccentric vs. concentric graded exercise in chronic tennis elbow. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Primary care in Uppsala County, Sweden. SUBJECTS: A total of 120 subjects with tennis elbow lasting more than three months were recruited from primary care and by advertisement. INTERVENTION: Eccentric (n = 60) or concentric exercise (n = 60), by lowering or lifting a weight, at home daily, for three months with gradually increasing load. MAIN MEASURES: Pain during muscle contraction and muscle elongation, as well as strength, was assessed at baseline and after one, two, three, six, and 12 months. Function and quality of life was assessed at baseline and after three, six and 12 months. RESULTS: The eccentric exercise group had faster regression of pain, with an average of 10% higher responder rate at all levels of pain reduction, both during muscle contraction and elongation, (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.006, respectively). Significant differences were found in Cox's analysis from two months onwards (HR 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63-0.96, p < 0.02). This represents an absolute pain reduction of 10% in the eccentric vs. the concentric group and a number-needed-to-treat of 10. The eccentric group also had a greater increase of muscle strength than the concentric (p < 0.02). The differences persisted throughout the follow-up period. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding function or quality of life measures. CONCLUSION: Eccentric graded exercise reduced pain and increased muscle strength in chronic tennis elbow more effectively than concentric graded exercise.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269215514527595

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Disability levels at the end of the program (12.56, 95% CI 10.25; 14.87) were within the ranges reported in previous studies (9-23 points).

    “Disability levels at the end of this program (12.56, 95% CI 10.25; 14.87) were within the ranges reported in previous studies (9–23 points), using either QuickDASH, DASH or the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation questionnaire (PRTEE) [74,75,78,79].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Peterson, M., Butler, S., Eriksson, M., & Svärdsudd, K.
Affiliations
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Uppsala University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Clinical Rehabilitation
Published
2014-03-14
Volume
28
Issue
9
Pages
862-872
ISSN
  • 0269-2155 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0873
OpenAlex
W2137651312
Cited by
103
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
9.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
lateral epicondylitis, eccentric exercise, concentric exercise, graded exercise, home-based exercise, analgesia, muscle strength, quality of life, elbow function
MeSH terms
Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Sweden, Tennis Elbow, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review