Effects of 5 weeks of administration of fluoxetine and dothiepin in normal volunteers on sleep, daytime sedation, psychomotor performance and mood
Abstract
This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized crossover study of long-term (5 weeks) administration of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) and dothiepin (75 mg/day for 1 week followed by 150 mg/day for 4 weeks) in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects were studied on day 10 and day 36 of treatment, with tests of nocturnal sleep, driving performance, continuous electroencephalogram (EEG), sleep during scheduled naps, computerized visual attention tasks, saccadic eye movement measurement and visual analogue ratings of mood. Both drugs had a marked suppressive effect on nocturnal rapid eye movement (REM) sleep; these effects were less at 36 days than at 10 days, and fluoxetine decreased and dothiepin increased REM in daytime naps. Sleep fragmentation after fluoxetine is similar to that reported in the literature. We found no sleep-promoting effects of dothiepin, in contrast to our previous single-dose study, and no subjective sleep effects of either drug. Subjects were less sleepy after both antidepressants than placebo at 5 weeks measured by sleep latencies and EEG. Saccadic eye movement measures were significantly faster after 5 weeks of fluoxetine than after 5 weeks of placebo. Reaction times to a peripheral stimulus during computerized tracking task were shorter after 10 days of dothiepin compared with placebo. Driving performance, visual attention and mood ratings showed no treatment effects. Subjective health reports during each 5 weeks of treatment were similar in number for the two drugs but showed a different profile of side-effects.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with poorer sleep efficiency than placebo (and fluoxetine 20mg), but shorter nocturnal awakenings than fluoxetine; REM sleep latency was significantly shorter for dothiepin than for fluoxetine.
“(Wilson et al., 2002) demonstrated that dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with poorer sleep efficiency than placebo (and fluoxetine 20mg), but shorter nocturnal awakenings than fluoxetine; REM sleep latency was significantly shorter for dothiepin than for fluoxetine.”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2002
Amitriptyline, nortriptyline and particularly dothiepin have frequently been linked with poorer reports of daytime drowsiness.
“At the same time, amitriptyline (Rosenzweig et al., 1998), nortriptyline (Hammack et al., 2002) and (particularly) dothiepin (Wilson et al., 2002) have frequently been linked with poorer reports of daytime drowsiness.”
From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2002
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 52
- 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05618.x · DOI
- 10.1002/hup.470070104 · DOI
- 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90062-0 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004714-199706000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
- Belenky G, 2001, Sleep, 24, A29
- 10.1093/sleep/19.9.727 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00172625 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1990.tb00045.x · DOI
- 10.1002/hup.327 · DOI
- 10.1093/sleep/5.S2.S67 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00174375 · DOI
- 10.1093/occmed/45.6.323 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02244985 · DOI
- Department of Health, 1992, The health of the nation: a strategy for health in England
- 10.1177/026988119901300204 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.887 · DOI
- 10.1038/npp.1994.35 · DOI
- 10.4088/JCP.v58n0502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/art.1780391111 · DOI
- Griffiths A N, 1986, Br J Pharmacol, 89, 707
- 10.1038/npp.1994.10 · DOI
- 10.1177/026988119200600212 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004850-199010000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199701/02)12:1<71::AID-HUP839>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
- 10.2165/00003495-198938010-00005 · DOI
- 10.1518/001872098779480569 · DOI
- Mercer A, 1988, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 25, 680
- 10.1001/archpsyc.55.6.534 · DOI
- 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90023-1 · DOI
- 10.1016/0028-3908(88)90180-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00058-7 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0033291700014379 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04468.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/aje/136.7.873 · DOI
- Rechtschaffen A, 1968, A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects
- 10.1093/sleep/16.4.301 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02246954 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00092-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00315137 · DOI
- Satterlee W G, 1995, Psychopharmacol Bull, 31, 227
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64601-6 · DOI
- 10.2466/pms.1998.87.3.817 · DOI
- 10.1177/0960327184003001051 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90096-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/clpt.1991.122 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004850-199409000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91345-8 · DOI
- 10.1159/000119185 · DOI
- 10.1177/026988119601000209 · DOI
- 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90068-7 · DOI
- 10.1177/026988110001400420 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s002139900362 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Antidepressants and their effect on sleep
Mayers, A. G., & Baldwin, D. S. (2005) · Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Experimental · doi:10.1002/hup.726 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Knorr, U., Madsen, J. M., & Kessing, L. V. (2019) · Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1037/pha0000264 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wilson, S. J., Bailey, J. E., Alford, C., Weinstein, A., & Nutt, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of the West of England (GB)
- Venue
- Journal of Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-331
- ISSN
- 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7285
- OpenAlex
- W2060071097
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 2.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
- Keywords
- fluoxetine, dothiepin, antidepressant effects on sleep, REM sleep suppression, daytime sedation, psychomotor performance, saccades, visual attention, mood, sleep fragmentation, driving performance, adverse effects
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Affect, Attention, Automobile Driving, Dothiepin, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Saccades, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Cross-Over Studies, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review