Cited by 30Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and Work-Related Fatigue

Effects of 5 weeks of administration of fluoxetine and dothiepin in normal volunteers on sleep, daytime sedation, psychomotor performance and mood

Wilson, S. J., Bailey, J. E., Alford, C., Weinstein, A., Nutt, D. J.·2002·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

This was a placebo-controlled, double-blind randomized crossover study of long-term (5 weeks) administration of fluoxetine (20 mg/day) and dothiepin (75 mg/day for 1 week followed by 150 mg/day for 4 weeks) in 12 healthy male volunteers. Subjects were studied on day 10 and day 36 of treatment, with tests of nocturnal sleep, driving performance, continuous electroencephalogram (EEG), sleep during scheduled naps, computerized visual attention tasks, saccadic eye movement measurement and visual analogue ratings of mood. Both drugs had a marked suppressive effect on nocturnal rapid eye movement (REM) sleep; these effects were less at 36 days than at 10 days, and fluoxetine decreased and dothiepin increased REM in daytime naps. Sleep fragmentation after fluoxetine is similar to that reported in the literature. We found no sleep-promoting effects of dothiepin, in contrast to our previous single-dose study, and no subjective sleep effects of either drug. Subjects were less sleepy after both antidepressants than placebo at 5 weeks measured by sleep latencies and EEG. Saccadic eye movement measures were significantly faster after 5 weeks of fluoxetine than after 5 weeks of placebo. Reaction times to a peripheral stimulus during computerized tracking task were shorter after 10 days of dothiepin compared with placebo. Driving performance, visual attention and mood ratings showed no treatment effects. Subjective health reports during each 5 weeks of treatment were similar in number for the two drugs but showed a different profile of side-effects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/026988110201600406

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with poorer sleep efficiency than placebo (and fluoxetine 20mg), but shorter nocturnal awakenings than fluoxetine; REM sleep latency was significantly shorter for dothiepin than for fluoxetine.

    “(Wilson et al., 2002) demonstrated that dothiepin (75-150mg) was associated with poorer sleep efficiency than placebo (and fluoxetine 20mg), but shorter nocturnal awakenings than fluoxetine; REM sleep latency was significantly shorter for dothiepin than for fluoxetine.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2002

  • Amitriptyline, nortriptyline and particularly dothiepin have frequently been linked with poorer reports of daytime drowsiness.

    “At the same time, amitriptyline (Rosenzweig et al., 1998), nortriptyline (Hammack et al., 2002) and (particularly) dothiepin (Wilson et al., 2002) have frequently been linked with poorer reports of daytime drowsiness.”

    From Antidepressants and their effect on sleep (2005) · cites this paper as Wilson et al., 2002

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1991.tb05618.x · DOI
  2. 10.1002/hup.470070104 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90062-0 · DOI
  4. 10.1097/00004714-199706000-00004 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Belenky G, 2001, Sleep, 24, A29
  6. 10.1093/sleep/19.9.727 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00172625 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1111/j.1472-8206.1990.tb00045.x · DOI
  9. 10.1002/hup.327 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/sleep/5.S2.S67 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/BF00174375 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/occmed/45.6.323 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/BF02244985 · DOI
  14. Department of Health, 1992, The health of the nation: a strategy for health in England
  15. 10.1177/026988119901300204 · DOI
  16. 10.1136/bmj.311.7010.887 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/npp.1994.35 · DOI
  18. 10.4088/JCP.v58n0502 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1002/art.1780391111 · DOI
  20. Griffiths A N, 1986, Br J Pharmacol, 89, 707
  21. 10.1038/npp.1994.10 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/026988119200600212 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00004850-199010000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1077(199701/02)12:1<71::AID-HUP839>3.0.CO;2-3 · DOI
  25. 10.2165/00003495-198938010-00005 · DOI
  26. 10.1518/001872098779480569 · DOI
  27. Mercer A, 1988, Br J Clin Pharmacol, 25, 680
  28. 10.1001/archpsyc.55.6.534 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/0278-5846(88)90023-1 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/0028-3908(88)90180-3 · DOI
  31. 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00058-7 · DOI
  32. 10.1017/S0033291700014379 · DOI
  33. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1995.tb04468.x · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1093/aje/136.7.873 · DOI
  35. Rechtschaffen A, 1968, A manual of standardized terminology, techniques and scoring system for sleep stages of human subjects
  36. 10.1093/sleep/16.4.301 · DOI
  37. 10.1007/BF02246954 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S0006-3223(98)00092-4 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1007/BF00315137 · DOI
  40. Satterlee W G, 1995, Psychopharmacol Bull, 31, 227
  41. 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)64601-6 · DOI
  42. 10.2466/pms.1998.87.3.817 · DOI
  43. 10.1177/0960327184003001051 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0013-4694(87)90096-4 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1038/clpt.1991.122 · DOI
  46. 10.1097/00004850-199409000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91345-8 · DOI
  48. 10.1159/000119185 · DOI
  49. 10.1177/026988119601000209 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/0013-4694(93)90068-7 · DOI
  51. 10.1177/026988110001400420 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1007/s002139900362 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, S. J., Bailey, J. E., Alford, C., Weinstein, A., & Nutt, D. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of the West of England (GB)
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2002-07
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
321-331
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2060071097
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
Keywords
fluoxetine, dothiepin, antidepressant effects on sleep, REM sleep suppression, daytime sedation, psychomotor performance, saccades, visual attention, mood, sleep fragmentation, driving performance, adverse effects
MeSH terms
Adult, Affect, Attention, Automobile Driving, Dothiepin, Double-Blind Method, Electroencephalography, Fluoxetine, Humans, Male, Psychomotor Performance, Saccades, Sleep, Sleep Stages, Sleep, REM, Polysomnography, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Cross-Over Studies, Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review