Cited by 12Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorEpigenetics and DNA MethylationNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Cocaine-induced changes in behaviour and DNA methylation in rats are influenced by inter-individual differences in spontaneous exploratory activity

Vaher, Kadi, Anier, Kaili, Jürgenson, Monika, Harro, Jaanus, Kalda, Anti·2020·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Background: Individual differences in behavioural traits influence susceptibility to addictive disorders. Drug addiction involves changes in gene expression, proposed to occur via DNA methylation (DNAm). Aims: To investigate DNAm changes in reward-related brain structures (nucleus accumbens (NAc), lateral habenula (LHb)) in response to cocaine exposure in rats differing in spontaneous exploratory activity. Methods: Rats were observed in the exploration box and categorised as high- (HE) or low explorers (LE). Rats were administered vehicle or cocaine (12 mg/kg, i.p.) for 7 days, followed by a 14-day withdrawal period and cocaine challenge (7 mg/kg); horizontal locomotor activity was recorded. Brain tissue was dissected after 24 h; we analysed messenger RNA (mRNA) and activity levels of epigenetic DNA modifiers (DNMTs and TETs) as well as mRNA and promoter methylation levels at selected genes previously linked to addictive behaviours. Results: The cocaine challenge dose stimulated locomotor activity in both LE- and HE rats only when administered after a repeated cocaine schedule, suggesting development of behavioural sensitisation. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction analyses demonstrated higher basal expression of Dnmt3a, Tet2 and Tet3 in the LHb of HE- vs. LE rats, and we observed differential effects of cocaine exposure on the expression and activity of epigenetic DNA modifiers in the NAc and LHb of HE- and LE rats. Furthermore, cocaine exposure differentially altered promoter methylation levels of A 2A R, Ppp1cc, and Taar7b in the NAc and LHb of HE- and LE rats. Conclusions: DNAm might play a role in the HE- and LE phenotypes as well as mediate behavioural effects of LE- and HE rats in response to drugs of abuse.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881120916137

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaher, K., Anier, K., Jürgenson, M., Harro, J., & Kalda, A.
Affiliations
University of Tartu (EE)
Corresponding author
Kalda, Anti
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2020-04-27
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
680-692
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W3018157131
Cited by
12
References
56
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
eesti teadusagentuur (PUT1686 and IUT20-40)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
cocaine, DNA methylation, individual differences, nucleus accumbens, lateral habenula, behavioral sensitization, DNMT3A, TET2, TET3, promoter methylation, adenosine A2A receptor, PPP1CC, drug addiction, locomotor activity, cocaine withdrawal
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Cocaine, Exploratory Behavior, Locomotion, Male, Nucleus Accumbens, Promoter Regions, Genetic, Rats, Wistar, DNA Methylation, Habenula, Cocaine-Related Disorders, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review