The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Referencing as Persuasion
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Thus, the cited documents have not been selected because of their content, but in order to influence the reader as to the claims of the citing author.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 1977
In the citing paper
“A typical and highly cited paper in this context is Gilbert (1977) who regards citations as tools for persuasion.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 1977
In the citing paper
“According to Gilbert (1977), an author selects documents for citing which were published by reputable authors in the field.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Gilbert, 1977
In the citing paper
“authors cite to support their claims and to convince readers of their knowledge claims.”
From Core Elements in the Process of Citing Publications: Conceptual Overview of the Literature (2018) · cites this paper as Gilbert (1977)
Citations
Cites
(1968) · PubMed · Cited by 4,803
Method and Measurement in Sociology.
Churchill, L., & Cicourel, A. V. (1966) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091316 · Cited by 881
Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems.
Lyon, A., & Ravetz, J. R. (1973) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2218013 · Cited by 842
Is Technology Historically Independent of Science? A Study in Statistical Historiography
Price, D. J. D. S. (1965) · Technology and Culture · doi:10.2307/3101749 · Cited by 286
The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote
Kaplan, N. (1965) · American Documentation · doi:10.1002/asi.5090160305 · Cited by 244
Some Correlates of a Citation Measure of Productivity in Science
Bayer, A. E., & Folger, J. K. (1966) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.2307/2111920 · Cited by 208
The Transformation of Research Findings into Scientific Knowledge
Gilbert, N. (1976) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277600600302 · Cited by 172
Visibility and the Structural Bases of Awareness of Scientific Research
Cole, S., & Cole, J. R. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2091914 · Cited by 106
Methodology in the sociology of science: Some reflections on the study of radio astronomy
Mulkay, M. (1974) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901847401300206 · Cited by 48
Moravcsik, M. J. (1973) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(73)90006-1 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 685
The most-cited statistical papers
Ryan, T. P., & Woodall, W. H. (2005) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664760500079373 · Cited by 94
International Relations at the End: A Sociological Autopsy
Kristensen, P. M. (2018) · International Studies Quarterly · doi:10.1093/isq/sqy002 · Cited by 90
Drivers of citations: An analysis of publications in “top” accounting journals
Meyer, M., Waldkirch, R. W., Duscher, I., & Just, A. (2017) · Critical Perspectives on Accounting · doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2017.07.001 · Cited by 83
Referential Behavior in Scientific Writing: aDiachronic Study (1810–1995)
Salager‐Meyer, F. (1999) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/s0889-4906(97)00042-2 · Cited by 83
Revisiting the Scientometric Conceptualization of Impact and Its Measurement
Abramo, G. (2018) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2018.05.001 · Cited by 80
“Suffice here to recall that Michael Mulkay (1976) and David Bloor (1976) were the first to develop the fundamentals of constructivism, followed by Gilbert (1977) and Latour (1987).”
BackgroundReward, persuasion, and the Sokal Hoax: A study in citation identities
White, H. D. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000027313.91401.9b · Cited by 80
Feedback on Professional Skills as Enculturation into Communities of Practice
Gilbuena, D. M., Sherrett, B., Gummer, E. S., Champagne, A. B., & Koretsky, M. (2014) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/jee.20061 · Cited by 90
Citation Context Analysis as a Method for Conducting Rigorous and Impactful Literature Reviews
Anderson, M. H., & Lemken, R. K. (2020) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428120969905 · Cited by 83
Ji, Y. G., Tao, W., & Rim, H. (2021) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-021-04748-w · Cited by 77
Didegah, F., Bowman, T. D., & Holmberg, K. (2018) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23934 · Cited by 77
Nonmonotonic Status Effects in New Product Adoption
Hu, Y., & den Bulte, C. V. (2014) · Marketing Science · doi:10.1287/mksc.2014.0857 · Cited by 73
Nair, L. B., & Gibbert, M. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-1937-y · Cited by 76
The “meaning” of citation in the context of a scientifically peripheral country
Velho, L. (1986) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016609 · Cited by 74
How is research blogged? A content analysis approach
Shema, H., Bar‐Ilan, J., & Thelwall, M. A. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23239 · Cited by 73
Jardine, N. (2000) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198250395.001.0001 · Cited by 72
Yue, W., & Wilson, C. S. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034377.93437.18 · Cited by 71
Citation Analysis: Queries and Caveats
Porter, A. L. (1977) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631277700700207 · Cited by 70
Knowledge impact An Appraisal of Tourism Scholarship
Xiao, H., & Smith, S. L. J. (2008) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2007.06.008 · Cited by 69
MAPPING OF SCIENCE: POSSIBILITIES AND LIMITATIONS
Rip, A. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70537-2.50014-3 · Cited by 69
Transparency and the rhetorical use of citations to Robert Yin in case study research
Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Bagnoli, C. (2019) · Meditari Accountancy Research · doi:10.1108/medar-08-2017-0202 · Cited by 86
The Work the Document Does: Research, Policy, and Equity in Health
Freeman, R. (2006) · Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law · doi:10.1215/03616878-31-1-51 · Cited by 66
Professions and Powerlessness: Female Marginality in the Learned Occupations
Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (1990) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/j.1467-954x.1990.tb00848.x · Cited by 66
Loet Leydesdorff, A., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Milojević, S. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.006 · Cited by 62
Testing the Ortega hypothesis: Facts and artifacts
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1987) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02016665 · Cited by 64
A Disagreement over Agreement and Consensus in Constructionist Sociology
Button, G., & Sharrock, W. (1993) · Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour · doi:10.1111/j.1468-5914.1993.tb00228.x · Cited by 63
Health discussions on the Internet
Wikgren, M. C. (2001) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/s0740-8188(01)00091-3 · Cited by 62
Condemned to be meaningful: Non‐response in studies of men and infertility
Lloyd, M. (1996) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.ep10939057 · Cited by 61
Scientific productivity: An exploratory study of metrics and incentives
Lindner, M. D., Torralba, K. D., & Khan, N. A. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0195321 · Cited by 61
The diffusion of scientific innovations: A role typology
Herfeld, C. S., & Doehne, M. (2018) · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A · doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.12.001 · Cited by 63
“Citations (1) attribute contributions to a particular publication and (2) convince a scientific community of the validity and novelty of one’s own research (Gilbert 1977, Kaplan 1965).”
BackgroundParadigm Debates, Turf Wars, and the Conduct of Sociocognitive Inquiry in Composition
Berkenkotter, C. (1991) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/358196 · Cited by 58
Why Do We Quote? The Culture and History of Quotation
Finnegan, R. H. (2011) · Open Book Publishers · doi:10.11647/obp.0012 · Cited by 58
Geography of scientific knowledge: A proximity approach
Frenken, K. (2020) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00058 · Cited by 56
The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations
Pichappan, P., & Sarasvady, S. (2002) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/a:1016070029935 · Cited by 57
A rational indicator of scientific creativity
Soler, J. M. (2007) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2006.10.004 · Cited by 56
Peng, T., & Zhu, J. J. H. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22649 · Cited by 63
Does quality and content matter for citedness? A comparison with para-textual factors and over time
Bornmann, L., & Loet Leydesdorff, A. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2015.03.001 · Cited by 56
The geography of scientific citations
Wuestman, M., Hoekman, J., & Frenken, K. (2019) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.004 · Cited by 56
McElhinny, B. S., HOLS, M., Holtzkener, J., Unger, S., & Hicks, C. (2003) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404503323012 · Cited by 55
Bibliometric Delineation of Scientific Fields
Zitt, M., Lelu, A., Cadot, M., & Cabanac, G. (2019) · Springer handbooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_2 · Cited by 61
Gondal, N. (2010) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/j.socnet.2010.09.001 · Cited by 54
Norms and functions in citation: The view of journal editors and referees in psychology
Cronin, B. (1982) · Social Science Information Studies · doi:10.1016/0143-6236(82)90001-1 · Cited by 54
Studying review articles in scientometrics and beyond: a research agenda
Blümel, C. D., & Schniedermann, A. (2020) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-020-03431-7 · Cited by 63
“Gilbert (1977), for instance, explored the ways by which references are used to persuade readers.”
BackgroundA convincing argument: Corpus analysis and academic persuasion
Hyland, K. (2004) · Studies in corpus linguistics · doi:10.1075/scl.16.05hyl · Cited by 53
Allen, B., Qin, J., & Lancaster, F. W. (1994) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631279402400204 · Cited by 53
Hoy, P., Raaz, O., & Wehmeier, S. (2007) · Public Relations Review · doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.011 · Cited by 53
Trajectories of Collaboration and Competition in a Medical Discovery
Atkinson, P., Batchelor, C., & Parsons, E. P. (1998) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399802300301 · Cited by 53
Bornmann, L., Wray, K. B., & Haunschild, R. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03326-2 · Cited by 58
“Social constructivists (e.g., Gilbert 1977) claim that researchers cite publications for rhetorical and strategic reasons, that is, reasons that do not, or scarcely, depend on the quality of the cited publication (Case and Higgins 2000).”
BackgroundResultThe Hyperlinked society: questioning connections in the digital age
(2009) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-5339 · Cited by 54
Batra, S. (2024) · Engineering Construction & Architectural Management · doi:10.1108/ecam-04-2023-0316 · Cited by 62
Bornmann, L., & Marewski, J. N. (2019) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-019-03018-x · Cited by 56
“One of the earliest studies in this respect has been conducted by Gilbert (1977) who interprets citations as tools for persuasion.”
BackgroundTsui, L. (2008) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/nmw.5680986.0001.001 · Cited by 55
Understanding journal usage: A statistical analysis of citation and use
McDonald, J. D. (2006) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.20420 · Cited by 52
Author and Citation Patterns for The Journal of Business Communication, 1978-1992
Reinsch, N. L., & Lewis, P. V. (1993) · Journal of Business Communication · doi:10.1177/002194369303000404 · Cited by 51
Mining typical features for highly cited papers
Wang, M., Yu, G., & Yu, D. (2011) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-011-0366-1 · Cited by 51
Golem science and the public understanding of science: from deficit to dilemma
Locke, S. (1999) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1088/0963-6625/8/2/301 · Cited by 51
The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using n-grams
Bertin, M., Atanassova, I., Sugimoto, C. R., & Lariviere, V. (2016) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2134-8 · Cited by 50
The multilayered nature of reference selection
Camacho‐Miñano, M., & Nickel, M. N. (2009) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21018 · Cited by 50
THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF EVALUATION OF SCHOLARLY PERFORMANCE
Nederhof, A. J. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70537-2.50012-x · Cited by 50
Mapping teacher education domain: A document co-citation analysis from 1992 to 2012
Özçınar, H. (2015) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2014.12.006 · Cited by 49
Thomas, P. R., & Watkins, D. S. (1998) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02459050 · Cited by 48
Beyond the holy grail: From citation theory to indicator theories
Wouters, P. F. (1999) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02458496 · Cited by 55
Hallinger, P., & Kovačević, J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.05070-3 · Cited by 49
A TEST OF THE ORTEGA HYPOTHESIS IN CRIMINOLOGY
GREEN, G. S. (1981) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1981.tb00403.x · Cited by 48
Sustainability of incentives for excellent research — The German case
Schmoch, U., & Schubert, T. (2009) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-009-2127-y · Cited by 48
Reinstein, A., Hasselback, J. R., Riley, M. E., & Sinason, D. H. (2011) · Issues in Accounting Education · doi:10.2308/iace.2011.26.1.99 · Cited by 47
The A nna K arenina principle: A way of thinking about success in science
Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2012) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22661 · Cited by 54
Bibliometrics as a tool for research evaluation
Hicks, D. M., & Melkers, J. E. (2013) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9780857932402.00019 · Cited by 51
Scientific teams: Self-assembly, fluidness, and interdependence
Wang, J., & Hicks, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2014.12.006 · Cited by 55
Citations, contexts, and humanistic discourse: Toward automatic extraction and classification
Sula, C. A., & Miller, M. (2014) · Literary and Linguistic Computing · doi:10.1093/llc/fqu019 · Cited by 46
Bibliometric maps and co-word analysis of the literature on international cooperation on migration
Khaldi, H., & Prado‐Gascó, V. (2021) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-020-01085-4 · Cited by 46
Using Knowledge in Management Studies
Golden‐Biddle, K., Locke, K., & Reay, T. (2006) · Journal of Management Inquiry · doi:10.1177/1056492606291199 · Cited by 46
Dynamic Scaling and Growth Behavior of Queuing Network Normalization Constants
Lam, S. S. (1982) · Journal of the ACM · doi:10.1145/322307.322321 · Cited by 46
Moed, H. F., & Garfield, E. (2004) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000034375.39385.84 · Cited by 45
An Argument-Annotated Corpus of Scientific Publications
Lauscher, A., Glavaš, G., & Ponzetto, S. P. (2018) · Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5206 · Cited by 45
Semiotics and evaluative bibliometrics
Cronin, B. (2000) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/eum0000000007123 · Cited by 45
A meta-analysis of semantic classification of citations
Kunnath, S. N., Herrmannova, D., Pride, D., & Knoth, P. (2021) · Quantitative Science Studies · doi:10.1162/qss_a_00159 · Cited by 43
Ferrara, A., & Bonaccorsi, A. J. (2016) · Research Evaluation · doi:10.1093/reseval/rvv048 · Cited by 43
A Rare Case of Gender Parity in Academia
Lynn, F. B., Noonan, M. C., Sauder, M., & Andersson, M. A. (2018) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soy126 · Cited by 45
Giving credit where credit is due: Dorothy Swaine Thomas and the “Thomas Theorem”
Smith, R. S. (1995) · The American Sociologist · doi:10.1007/bf02692352 · Cited by 42
Paul, D. (2000) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/105065190001400202 · Cited by 42
Diffusing through Disciplines: Insiders, Outsiders, and Socially Influenced Citation Behavior
Lynn, F. B. (2014) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/sou069 · Cited by 42
How significant is corporate social responsibility to business research?
Gago, R. F., García, L. C., & Godos‐Díez, J. (2020) · Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management · doi:10.1002/csr.1927 · Cited by 48
Vieira, E. S. (2023) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-023-04715-4 · Cited by 49
Eponymy and Obliteration by Incorporation: The case of the “Nash Equilibrium”
McCain, K. W. (2011) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.21536 · Cited by 41
Citation classics in periodontology: a controlled study
Nieri, M., Saletta, D., Guidi, L., Buti, J., Franceschi, D., Mauro, S., & Pini‐Prato, G. (2007) · Journal Of Clinical Periodontology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-051x.2007.01060.x · Cited by 41
Using categorisations of citations when assessing the outcomes from health research
Hanney, S. R., Frame, I. A., Grant, J., Buxton, M., Young, T. A., & Lewison, G. (2005) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0279-y · Cited by 40
Narrative strategies in television science—a case study
Silverstone, R. (1984) · Media Culture & Society · doi:10.1177/016344378400600405 · Cited by 41
Everyday health information exchange and citation behaviour in Internet discussion groups
Wikgren, M. C. (2003) · New Review of Information Behaviour Research · doi:10.1080/14716310310001631543 · Cited by 40
Perspective—Open to Negotiation: Phenomenological Assumptions and Knowledge Dissemination
Bendersky, C., & McGinn, K. L. (2009) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1090.0487 · Cited by 40
Tai, Z. (2009) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01425.x · Cited by 39
Why I Am Not a Co-Citationist*
Edge, D. O. (1977) · Cited by 40
Scientific communities as autopoietic systems: The reproductive function of citations
Riviera, E. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22826 · Cited by 38
Franklin, J. J., & Johnston, R. (1988) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-70537-2.50017-9 · Cited by 39
Albanna, B., Handl, J., & Heeks, R. (2021) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-021-04128-1 · Cited by 38
“The social constructivists’ view (Gilbert, 1977; Knorr-Cetina, 1981; Latour, 1987) argues that scientific knowledge is socially constructed through the manipulation of political and financial resources and citations are used as persuasion tools (Peng & Zhu, 2012).”
BackgroundKwan, B. S. C., & Chan, H. (2013) · Journal of English for Academic Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2013.11.004 · Cited by 37
Lauscher, A., Ko, B., Kuehl, B., Johnson, S., Cohan, A., Jurgens, D., & Lo, K. (2022) · Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (NAACL-HLT) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.137 · Cited by 38
Are citation-based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery?
Arunachalam, S., & Manorama, K. (1989) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/bf02017061 · Cited by 37
Edmond, G., & Mercer, D. (2002) · Law & Literature · doi:10.1525/lal.2002.14.2.309 · Cited by 37
A study of citing motivation of Chinese scientists
Liu, M. (1993) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/016555159301900103 · Cited by 37
A comparison of citation contexts between natural sciences and social sciences and humanities
Chang, Y. (2013) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-013-0956-1 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Nigel Gilbert, G.
- Venue
- Social Studies of Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1977-02
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 113-122
- ISSN
- 0036-8539 (ISSN-L)
- 0306-3127
- 1460-3659
- OpenAlex
- W2171789734
- Cited by
- 691
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 32.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Social Studies of Science (publishedVersion)
- Surrey Research Insight Open Access (The University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Keywords
- referencing, citation, persuasion, epistemic authority, academic writing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review