The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Criminalising the other: challenging the race–gang nexus
Abstract
Whilst criminologists, sociologists and policy-makers fuel a perennial debate over the existential value of the ‘gang’, 1 the Criminal Justice System (CJS) in England and Wales creeps further into the lives of marginalised and excluded young Black men who have been identified as ‘gang-involved’, a ‘gang-concern’ or ‘associated’ with a gang. Drawing on research commissioned by two North West (English) Local Authority Crime Reduction Partnerships, this article offers a unique insight into the problematic way that the term ‘gang’ is being appropriated and used by criminal justice agencies. The findings suggest that the ‘gang’ label legitimises the over-policing of Black people and communities and acts as an inhibitor to the reconciliation of other, more acute, socio-economic problems endured within Black and Minority Ethnic (BAME) communities. Inspired by the paper ‘White sociology, black struggle’, 2 this article is concerned with the problematising effects and the enduring features of the gang construct as a ‘signifier’ for Black men. More contentiously, it highlights the contribution of criminology to the Othering of young Black men, to show that the contemporary position of young Black men as significantly overrepresented and differentially treated within the CJS reflects a continuity with the idea of the ‘Black folk devil’ inherent within a burgeoning body of ‘uncritical’ criminology.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such asymmetry of blame naturally creates disparities in law enforcement that are not only normalised or legitimised but legalised too - when digital platforms become technologies of policing and criminal justice reveals itself as a system of racial(ised) discrimination”
From Copping the blame: the role of YouTube videos in the criminalisation of UK drill music (2022) · cites this paper as Williams, 2014
Citations
Cites
Handbook of qualitative research
(2000) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-0057 · Cited by 7,081
Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2012) · Cited by 5,975
Garland, D. (2001) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003060581-51 · Cited by 5,430
The Empire Strikes Back: Race and Racism in 70s Britain
Elliott, B. (1985) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/590820 · Cited by 812
Cottee, S. (2002) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/136248060200600401 · Cited by 590
The Oxford Handbook of Criminology
Morgan, R., Maguire, M., & Reiner, R. (1994) · Bristol Research (University of Bristol) · Cited by 554
The criminological imagination
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-5384 · Cited by 432
Jenkins, R. (2008) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446214855 · Cited by 325
The Asian gang: ethnicity, identity, masculinity
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-0616 · Cited by 297
Born Fi' Dead: A Journey through the Jamaican Posse Underworld.
Hintzen, P. C., & Gunst, L. (1996) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2077123 · Cited by 295
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Hallsworth S., 2014, Youth and Policy, 4, 35
- Peachey P., 2013, The Independent
- Amos V., 1982, Rethinking Social Inequality
- O’Carroll L., 2011, The Guardian
- Toy J., 2008, Metropolitan Police Service
- Antrobus S., 2009, Dying to Belong: an in-depth review of street gangs in Britain
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226190174.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Hallsworth, 2012, Youth and Policy
- 2008, (Re)thinking Gangs
- Williams, 2014, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies
- Kundnani A., 2009, Spooked! How not to prevent violent extremism
- Williams, 2014, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies
Cited by
Owusu-Bempah, A. (2017) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480616677493 · Cited by 135
White enough, not white enough: racism and racialisation among Poles in the UK
Narkowicz, K. (2023) · Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies · doi:10.1080/1369183x.2022.2154913 · Cited by 96
Fatsis, L. (2019) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0038026119842480 · Cited by 87
The Black Criminal Other as an Object of Social Control
Williams, P., & Clarke, B. (2018) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci7110234 · Cited by 79
Self-citationIlan, J. (2020) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azz086 · Cited by 69
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, P.
- Corresponding author
- Williams, Patrick
- Venue
- Race & Class
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2014-12-24
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 18-35
- ISSN
- 0306-3968 (ISSN-L)
- 1741-3125
- OpenAlex
- W2080093981
- Cited by
- 100
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Race & Class (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
- Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Keywords
- young Black men, over-policing, othering, Black and minority ethnic communities, criminal justice system, racial discrimination in policing, socioeconomic deprivation, signifier, England and Wales
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Criminalising the other: challenging the race–gang nexus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0306396814556221
- The paper
- Williams, P. (2015). Criminalising the other: challenging the race–gang nexus. Race & Class. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306396814556221
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.