Cited by 288Migraine and Headache StudiesTemporomandibular Joint DisordersTraumatic Brain Injury Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Perceived triggers of primary headache disorders: A meta-analysis

Open access

Abstract

Objective: To quantitatively synthesize extant literature on perceived triggers of primary headache disorders. Methods: A meta-analytic review of headache trigger survey studies was conducted. Endorsement rates, assessment method, and headache and sample characteristics were extracted from included articles. Separate random-effects models were used to assess trigger endorsement rates and post-hoc meta-regressions examined potential moderator variables. Results: 85 articles from 1958 to 2015 were included, involving 27,122 participants and querying 420 unique triggers (collapsed into 15 categories). Four-fifths (0.81; 95% CI .75 to .86) of individuals with migraine or tension-type headache endorsed at least one trigger. Rates increased with the number of categories queried (OR: 1.18, 1.08–1.30) and year of publication (OR: 1.04, 1.00–1.08). The triggers most commonly endorsed were stress (.58, .53–.63) and sleep (.41, .36–.47). Conclusions: Extreme heterogeneity characterizes the headache trigger literature. Most individuals with a primary headache disorder perceive their attacks to be triggered by one or more precipitants, the most common of which are stress and sleep. However, trigger endorsement is influenced by method of assessment. Enhancing methodological consistency and prioritizing experimental studies would improve our understanding of headache triggers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0333102417727535

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Pellegrino, A. B. W., Davis-Martin, R. E., Houle, T. T., Turner, D. P., & Smitherman, T. A.
Affiliations
  • Hartford HealthCare Headache Center, West Hartford, CT, USA
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Smitherman, Todd A
Venue
Cephalalgia
Published
2017-08-20
Volume
38
Issue
6
Pages
1188-1198
ISSN
  • 0333-1024 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2982
OpenAlex
W2746815301
Cited by
288
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 5
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cephalalgia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS065257)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
headache triggers, primary headache, migraine, tension-type headache, stress, sleep
MeSH terms
Humans, Headache Disorders, Primary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review