Cited by 171Migraine and Headache StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationTraumatic Brain Injury Research

Behavioral management of headache triggers: Avoidance of triggers is an inadequate strategy

Martin, Paul R., MacLeod, Colin·2009·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The standard clinical advice for individuals who suffer from recurrent headaches is that the best way to prevent headaches is to avoid the triggers. This review challenges that advice from a number of perspectives, including: that the advice is given in a theoretical vacuum; it is associated with practical problems; and it is not evidence-based. The review considers cognate literatures on stress, negative affect, and chronic pain that advocate approach/confront strategies over avoidance strategies. It is suggested that advice to avoid triggers could result in maintenance of the capacity of the trigger to precipitate headaches or even a sensitization process whereby tolerance diminishes. As anxiety researchers have investigated extensively the issue of how stimuli acquire and lose their capacity to elicit fear, this literature is explored to draw inferences for headache triggers. The review concludes with suggestions concerning etiology of chronic headache and associated management implications, and directions for future research. It argues that the philosophy of 'avoidance of triggers' should be replaced with 'coping with triggers,' as the latter includes both avoidance and approach/confront strategies involving exposure to triggers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.002

Cites

159 of 159 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin, P. R., & MacLeod, C.
Affiliations
  • Monash Medical Centre (AU)
  • The University of Western Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Martin, Paul R.
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
29
Issue
6
Pages
483-495
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974134796
Cited by
171
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 13
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Migraine and Headache Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Keywords
headache triggers, trigger avoidance, recurrent headache, chronic headache, avoidance strategies, stress, negative affect, chronic pain, sensitization, anxiety, fear acquisition, headache prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Affect, Alcohol Drinking, Anxiety Disorders, Avoidance Learning, Chronic Disease, Desensitization, Psychologic, Diet, Humans, Hunger, Menstruation, Pain, Sleep Wake Disorders, Stress, Psychological, Weather, Headache Disorders, Pain Management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review